You must log in or register to comment.
I’d argue the whole map should be blue.
Technically correct…the best kind of correct.
Going through the center of the Earth, that region in China is only 2.96 Chiles from Chile. I’d like to see a corrected map that accounts for subsurface travel.
Only if you can demonstrate that subsurface travel is possible given current technology, and therefore reasonable to account for.
I am personally concerned about the possibility of Chile firing neutrinos directly at me through the Earth.
This, too, shall pass (right thru you without incident).
What about a meson gun?
Well first of all, through Chile all things are possible, so jot that down.
If we’re digging a hole to China, it will be literally through Chile.
Argentinians will claim that Uyghurs in labour camps live the easy life, 5 Chiles away from Chile
Americans will use ANY form of measurement except metric, won’t they?
True. This is how I know I’m American, because I love this map.
Surely the red area is less than 1 Chile away from Chile and the Orange area is between 1 and 2 Chiles away.
Less than 5 or more than 4?
Less than 5 and* more than 4.
Yes
This map has no right being this thicc.
Que bacán huevon
Cállate aweonao.
I no cachai
I live within 2 Chiles of Chile. My ancestors come from 4 Chiles away from Chile. This information is now taking up space in my brain.
Are you an Arab-Antarctican?
No but that was one of the possibilities.
So there is an area in China that is truly safe?
this is what progress looks like
One and a little bit, and husband lived in Chile, so one degree removed person-wise.
If I went as close as I could get to Antarctica without crossing any water, I would be exactly 2 Chiles away from Chile
If I went as close as I could get to Antarctica without crossing any water, I would be in Chile. If I could cross the Darian Gap.
Tasmania?
Oh shit! They found me!
How Chile hole to China, chopstick?
no jokey here!
Sokay. I block.
Dafuq?
