Snorf@reddthat.com to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 year agoCan a company can itself Twitter now?message-squaremessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1message-squareCan a company can itself Twitter now?Snorf@reddthat.com to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareall-knight-party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoHow many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?
minus-squareNarrrz@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agohow much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?
minus-squareall-knight-party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI may have to rethink my understanding of the English language
minus-squarehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWait until you learn what “kuusi palaa” means in Finnish.
minus-squaresquiblet@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”
minus-squareall-knight-party@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoI just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister Edit: I am idiot
How many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?
how much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?
I may have to rethink my understanding of the English language
Wait until you learn what “kuusi palaa” means in Finnish.
I think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”
I just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister
Edit: I am idiot