You’re buying… A temporary permission to access certain content.
You’re buying… A temporary permission to access certain content.
They got a service provider to let its users browse Facebook for free, but that was banned a year later for being unfair. It’s still a thing in other developing counties I guess.
Indeed, but it’s true - Brave did bring this feature long ago. It’s a good thing for us, let multiple browsers try to one up each other on privacy focused features.
Why does Firefox need to tell Google which sites you’re visiting even if you don’t use Google Search ?
The fact that the lines and the labels are not aligned makes this visualization very weird.
Also, do you like the fact that lemmy doesn’t have the karma system that reddit does? What do you think about it?
I like that it has no Karma. Having a social credit system will inevitably lead to karma whoring here too.
(Not suggesting this over captcha)
All options I can think of without captcha are either unscalable or require you to give up privacy.
You just posted a link to some app most people don’t know about a “better Signal” , with no explanation of why. That’s classic spammy vibes.
It says unknown (mobile?) client for me too, using Sync with Bluetooth and location enabled and Play Store Services installed.
Whoever wrote that image tracking over-hyped it?
Found the “if it’s not agreeing with me it’s in bad faith” clown.
Sure, but they want to make money off it. Efforts won’t be equal, so how can they ensure other companies don’t profit more without proportional investment?
Same questions could be asked for medicine.
We are not an ideal world, unfortunately.
Not everyone wants to get drunk regularly, and having a bar close by could potentially bring drunk people in your neighborhood. Most of the bars in my city are clustered in commercial complexes, which are usually quiet empty after regular end of business hours.