But I can also bully them, humiliate them, degrade them, psychologically annihilate them even, and that’s fine, legallly.
It’s not legal in a lot of cases
Why?
It’s very hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
안녕하세요!
But I can also bully them, humiliate them, degrade them, psychologically annihilate them even, and that’s fine, legallly.
It’s not legal in a lot of cases
Why?
It’s very hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
You can punch them, but it’s battery. The same way you can mentally assault them, but that’s harassment.
I know you’re memeing, but to be honest, yes, I want a President whose platform is somewhat like what you described. Obviously I disagree with some random parts (i.e. “with more communism, no, more socialism, with consequences for the right”), but for heavens sake, at least the theoretical person running for President above is trying something new. They would get my vote.
This is what the Right is doing with Trump after all, and clearly people like it.
“Not bothering” means more people not supporting Democrats, which means Republicans getting elected more.
See? I can do DNC logic too. It’s actually your fault Trump got elected.
Ok. Sure. Myself and millions of others helped get Trump elected. Hopefully you can figure out how to appeal to us next election.
I’m not surprised you misinterpreted my comment, I’m surprised people upvoted your misinterpretation. I never said Trump was third party
I think some people have explained it decently, but as someone who did not vote for Harris, I have a simple explanation:
I do not want the Democratic party to think it’s Ok to be slightly better than Trump.
If I’m going to be honest, trans rights and immigration are minor issues compared to inequality and war in Gaza.
The Dems can be better, but they choose not to. Me voting for Dems signals that what Dems are doing is acceptable, but it’s not. I supported third party in 2024, and I will continue to do so until the Democrats get serious reform.
(For those who think it would be “less bad” with Harris, that’s the problem. I don’t care for “less bad” when the duopoly got us here regardless. Represent the people.)
Third parties represent the poor better
Lmao liberals downvoting you for daring to think sums up the 2024 election pretty good
People keep saying this, but misunderstand why people didn’t vote for Harris over Gaza.
It doesn’t matter if Trump is worse. People don’t want the Democrats to think this behavior is OK.
Nah they wouldn’t shut up about him til the point it got numb. Maybe they should have focused on Kamala instead.
I would assume the answer to your question is “this data sucks”
What does your escape plan look like?
Edit: lmao people LARPing
Honestly I didn’t see the community and thought this was you taking a picture of your office building or something
Surprised this is still getting developed and not on life support
Obligatory please-stop-releasing-new-distros-and-just-improve-exiting-things-instead
Well yea, if the government is running it, they’ll probably pay them?
Also many of the regular kernel contributors are paid because they work for a company that hired them to do it
It’s not about a divergent featureset, it’s about making sure Russian businesses can continue to legally use Linux if the US decides to make that the next step
Honestly I started writing a comment asking why it was dumb, and started writing points why it would be good, then came to the same conclusion that it was dumb. The amount of money they would have to put in to make it good is more than they can afford.
Which distros aren’t set and forget?
I use Arch btw