You always hear the phase “9 to 5” and also the song with the same name. Assuming you include 1 hour worth of breaks (30 minute lunch and two 15 minute breaks), you’re only working for 7 hours a day which comes up to 35 hours a week.

Now it feels like you have to work 8 hours a day (for a total of 40 hours of actual work), plus your other time off meaning you’re really there for 9 hours each day (for a total of 45 hours). Am i looking at that wrong, or did expected times change, and if so, when?

  • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    The last time I worked hourly was the late 90s. We got a paid 15 break per 4 hours worked. If we worked more than 6 hours, we also got an unpaid 30 minute lunch. I got no benefits because I was part-time at 37.5 hours per week.

      • domdanial@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I believe it is where I am too, 36+ is full-time for benefits requirements. Apparently the insurance company asked my employer to please make sure I was working at least 36hrs a week, because for a month or so I was only getting to 32.

      • Thebular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had a job where I was working 80 hours a week without breaks and my boss told me I was part time

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Imagine being that guy scheduling people for 39.9 hours thinking you’re a goddamn genius.

      • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        The “genius” was the IN state Congress that made it law that 37.5 and under must be considered part time, even for minors. I was working exactly that every week while also going to high school when I was 16.