JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-210 months agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-210 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoThis is a pinetime it looks like. You should get one, open source and $30.
minus-squareramsay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months agoDoes it support the watch command? user@watch:~ $ watch now Otherwise, who knows when “now” was… /s
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoWatches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoYeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
This is a pinetime it looks like.
You should get one, open source and $30.
Does it support the
watchcommand?user@watch:~ $ watch nowOtherwise, who knows when “now” was…
/s
Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother