I mean there’s Reddit ofc, as well as Twitter in its entirety, Discord is implementing some dumb updates, there are issues with Tumblr as well as everything to do with Meta, and I’m sure there are plenty more (and I haven’t even touched other digital media, for example the Sims). Why is it all happening in the span of about a couple months?

  • aragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lets take the example of Reddit. Reddit could have kept its costs to the minimum and could have run the site with the ad revenue that came in. In fact they could have talked transparently about their opex and asked for a simple donation drive every now and then like Wikipedia. If need be, they could have removed silly GIF replies and other stuff and focused on text alone. However this would not let them become the next Facebook. That’s what they wanted to be. At some point in their story was a choice to be forums 2.0 or get into a race to become a cash grab. Sadly they went for the latter.

    • Gargleblaster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      n fact they could have talked transparently about their opex and asked for a simple donation drive every now and then like Wikipedia.

      Let’s remember this about Kbin and the Fediverse.

      I would donate to help counterbalance the wave of migration that brought me here.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the money.

    US Fed has raised interest rates, destroying money for the first time in decades in an effort to stop our inflation problem

    The knock on effects is that banks literally have less money to lend to companies. Some companies are affected more than others by this environment. Tech was hit hard, extremely hard.

    With hundreds of thousands of layoffs, tech industry is contracting. Silicon Valley bank literally evaporated in the span of 3 days. Twitter was losing money and had to sell out. StackOverflow is losing money and is currently selling out.

    In this environment, Reddit is about to launch it’s long awaited IPO, the time when the public is allowed to directly buy Reddit stock and invest into the company. That’s what Initial Public Offering means. If Reddit does well, Reddit will pull in lots of money this year through this IPO.

    The CEO of Reddit needs to prove Reddit is profitable, or if not profitable… Will eventually be profitable. Stockholders don’t care about Reddit drama for the most part, but most are smart enough to read financial sheets. Reddit needs to show growing revenue, growing profits and cutting costs to attract money.

    As such, all of what Reddit’s CEO has done makes sense in the context of the IPO. He is betting that shareholders won’t notice the drop of high quality content creators from Reddit, since that’s not a financial number that’s reported. He can IPO, raising millions, maybe even billions for himself. The golden parachute outta here when everything gets screwed up in a year or two and collapses.

    I think today’s investors are smarter though, and the bearish economy and high interest rates means more investors will pay attention to underlying issues.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally the drama isn’t a big deal. But in a specific case the only value of the site is in the community moderation and the depth of data on the site.

      He needs investors to buy in but he also needs advertisers to buy in. Advertisers do not love paying for negative drama.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that Reddit can compete against Youtube, Facebook, or TikTok with regards to ads.

        They can make some money, yes. But Reddit will never have high-end ad revenue, not with its current model (or any changes they’re making).

    • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I disagree in it really making sense (at least long term, but I recognize this is also “normal” for these corporate types) - it destroys long term viability for short term goals.

      Happens all over the corporate world. They are encouraged to operate this way usually the guy there when the actions were taken getz out well before those long term consequences arrive. Hopefully Steve does bear the consequences himself, he dezerves it for being a horrible person in general.

    • merpthebirb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, investors are going to be even more inclined to identify exactly why the platform might be successful in the future. They’re not going to blindly throw money at new IPOs (as much) because debt isn’t free anymore.

  • Llamajockey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Late stage capitalism You make a business and it goes well, you make some money everyone is happy.

    But with time your profits will plateau or even decline. It’s natural, but businesses don’t understand that it is insane to expect a company to always turn crazy profits when the product does not evolve.

    Companies like apple and Microsoft don’t worry as much because they are constantly evolving with new product.

    Companies like Twitter, Facebook, reddit, Netflix have hit a wall where there really isn’t anywhere else to go so they start making shareholder centered decisions made by people who aren’t even in touch with the user base of their product.

  • vacuumflower@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing is chain reaction, another is that these media mostly came to existence in the same period of time. So they were aging synchronously.

    This was predictable and predicted many times. Just like a building constructed with violations is not going to collapse immediately after it’s finished, these things were not going to break (in various ways) immediately after being launched.

    They are breaking now. Oopsie.

    I hope XMPP makes a triumphant comeback. It’s not dead yet.

  • besux@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cory Doctorow has some very interesting blogposts on the topic. He call it enshittification. It’s more or less the business model of plattform Capitalism.

  • John Meadows@mstdn.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    @VoidCrow Everywhere you look you see overpaid executives and CEO’s who think they are actually brilliant enough to deserve their astronomical wages/compensation, and thus think they can do no wrong. Their ideas are always brilliant, and when the shit hits the fan, they blame their staff for a bad implementation and fire them first.

  • sourcery@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Search for ‘Enshittification’ if you want a pretty good analysis of what’s going on. But basically greed, capitalism and the never ending pursuit of growth.

      • Makr Alland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Workers created Reddit, like everything else. Economic systems don’t create anything, only determine who profits from those creations.

        • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          workers created the platform, Reddit is the content that is freely created by the community. see how now all the search results are useless because users deleted their own content, but the platform is still there.

          Edit I just found out that all my content that I edited + deleted a week ago and wasn’t visible then, is back.

          To check if your data is still available on reddit just do a Google search putting site:reddit.com and your username after it in the search box. Google has still the username in the cache so when you click on the link you’ll find your content under a “deleted” username.

          • Makr Alland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right, I should have specified I was referring to the platform. My point was against the dumb narrative that capitalism creates anything.

      • iByteABit@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is good at creating things, but terrible at maintaining their quality over time, because at the end of the day profits don’t always go hand in hand with product quality

        • odigo2020@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The sad truth. For example, Insta Pot has gone bankrupt recently because they built their stuff too well, and no one needed to buy more than one. Capitalism is the reason we have planned obsolescence and deliberately poor build quality of products.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    All these companies have done about as much growing as they can. I remember listening to the radio on my drive to work a year or two ago, and they were talking about how Facebook had done internal research and concluded that they had captured something like 95% of the possible user demographics, meaning that they were unlikely to be able to reach new customers because either you have Facebook and you use it, or you’ve already heard of it and you don’t want it/don’t use it anymore.

    It was interesting, because Facebook/Meta, like Twitter, Reddit, Discord and Tumblr are all for-profit companies that exist to make money, and yet, the expectation of infinite growth from the market never ceases. There will never be a time when the company has grown “enough”. Enter the short-term smash-and-grab strategies. The idea is that they know that their business model has peaked in terms of growth and profit and they now need to extract value from the company before the market catches up to that fact. Social media is inherently unprofitable. Nobody wants to actually pay for it, and they do not produce a product, so eventually once the ad revenue has reached critical mass, the users become the product and are essentially ransomed off. Reddit just tried to pass the buck onto the 3rd party app developers rather than the users, but since the API restrictions affects regular users as much as it does developers, it had the same effect.

    Suffice to say, unless you are a member of a social media platform that is a non profit, this is going to keep happening. Even if you land on a site that prides themselves on being excellent stewards of their company and never prioritize profits and growth over stability and customer satisfaction, eventually they will be forced to make a decision - lose a lot of money or lose some customers. The answer, sadly, is all too obvious to them by now.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Social media is inherently unprofitable. Nobody wants to actually pay for it, and they do not produce a product

      i miss when people were just excited to be able to chat with others online

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I agree. Sometimes I yearn for the halcyon days of “Web 1.0”, before the corporations muscled their way in and took what regular people built from the ground up and perverted it into a mechanism of capitalism and corporate greed. It was like the wild west and every session was an adventure.

        Maybe I just have rose tinted glasses on, but it seemed to me like the internet was a more pleasant place when things were more decentralized.

      • flakeshake@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lemmys developers mostly fund themselves by a grant of the Dutch NLNet Foundation, they have talked about it in the past.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good news.

        Computers are much cheaper and text is very low bandwidth. A $100/month server will be able to host a large chunk of us, and donations will likely be able to cover these meager costs.

        Without a need to grow exponentially, we can mostly sit happy on single physical server and $100/month (or so) independent instances.

        No need to build $million+ data centers like the big boys. We can take advantage of our small size instead.

  • got2best@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the free money train in leaving the station and everyone is scrambling to be profitable. But that’s just an assumption based on twitch and Reddit right now.

  • AshenPaladin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know honestly, greed probably. But it’s such a shame. It seems like the internet as a whole is heading in a horrible direction, and not enough people care about it for there to be something done about it.

    • DoomBananas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But here we are dipping our toes in the fediverse, a bit early for the non tech savvy people but from my point of view we are currently proving that monolithic corps are no longer needed. They are convenient, but not alfa-omega.

    • emptyother@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The climate is heading in a horrible direction, and not enough people care. Politics are heading in a horrible direction, and you know what? Not enough people care!

      Sorry, the last 4 years has made me very cynical. And I’m in a particularly blue mood today.

      • bmoney@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        dude i feel that. its just lame and hard to grip with

        its like i wish almost that i didnt care

  • aski3252@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many tech companies were overvalued for a long time. Everyone was happy to invest and pump money into those companies because “those platforms are going to be the future and I want to be part of it when they are starting to make a ton of money”. It didn’t matter that many of those companies were not profitable because they always promised to make up for that in the future.

    This classic idea is starting to break down a bit. Many Tech companies have become profitable in the meantime, but many of them also have various troubles like moderation.

    So why are so many media companies making “shitty decisions”? Well, because from a business perspective, they aren’t necessarily “shitty decisions”, they are kinda smart decisions. Reddit makes money by gathering data and by showing ads. They cannot show ads on apps they don’t control. So they have to handle a lot of traffic for which they get nothing back. That’s why they are trying to push as many people to use their app as possible. They know that the hardcore oldschool community won’t like that, but they are probably pretty sure that enough will switch to the app to make it worthwhile for them.

    Meta is fighting to stay relevant as well. Facebook was the foundation of social media for a long time, but in the digital space, this can change very quickly, so they constantly have to try new things.

    And if we look at games like the Sims, the game who really escalated the whole DLC thing, it’s a similar story. From a consumer perspective, what they are doing is bad. From a business perspective, it’s smart. And that’s what it ultimately comes down to.

    Companies’ main goal isn’t to satisfy their customers, it’s making money. If fucking over customers makes them more money, they do it in a heartbeat.

    • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve also made a lot of shitty decisions. Reddit decided to invest in NFTs when they had cheap money. That’s been about as successful as a lead balloon. That also burned a bunch of user good will in the process. Meta went all in on VR and the Metaverse. They’ve admitted that’s been a bust. This seems more like an A and B with A being cheap money evaporating and B being bad decisions.

      I’m reluctant to call the latest Reddit thing enshittification, but it really seems like they’re between steps 2 and 3.

      On a slightly different note, does any think enshittification will be the word of the year?

      • aski3252@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve also made a lot of shitty decisions.

        That’s the thing with tech companies. They are fast to rise, but also fast to fall, so they are always on the lookout for the next big thing. Blockchain tech was supposed to be the next big thing. Crypto currency was at the time already kinda the big thing in the tech industry’s eyes. And of course when that happens, everyone wants to be early bird for the next big thing and caution is pushed to the side.

        VR and AR are the same. It was and still is supposed to be the next big thing. Another one would be language models and “A.I.”. But because all those “new things” tend to be massively over hyped by people who often don’t really understand it and just have dollar signs in their eyes, they inevitably support the wrong thing every once in a while.