Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

I’m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. 😊 I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

  • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.netEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    By new how new are we talking? Because I haven't tested them in a couple months but it has failed logic questions I gave it before

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      The point is it keeps passing goalposts for intelligence. Feels like people want to move those goalposts to wherever we have it and AI does not.

      • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.netEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        !I expect that to happen, but I don't think we have artificial intelligence yet, I hold onto that. As someone else commented we're on the calculator portion of the language tree but using language has always been what separated us from other beings so some people thought of it as the proof of intelligence but it never was. It's much easier to design something specialized than something actually intelligent (much easier here still means very fucking hard) but some people have gone onto calling this narrow intelligence and if it can do!<

        As I was writing the above crossed out comment I did come to see your pov more closely and I guess in a way you're right, if we consider it narrow intelligence in terms of understanding and using language, because it is really good at language tasks but we expect artificial intelligence to be perfect for some reason and idk if that's right or not and that also might be what bothers you about the shifting goalposts.