• Saltarello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I forwarded this to my neighbour who is really into self hosting, particularly home automation stuff - has a pretty awesome Home Assistant set up. First thing they said? “But I’m 70, this only goes to 69”

    I told him in that case he must dismantle his self hosted servers immediately 😁

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah, but it’s how old you feel which is more important 😉

      Maybe those statistics could be really interesting:

      • How old do you feel when using proprietary software?
      • How old do you feel when using FOSS?
    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I also had to think, but I went for CloudPanel. Fantastic server manager software from Germany. Reverse proxy my docker containers with it. Lean. Stable. Reliable.

      Fuck cPanel or Plesk with their bullshit licenses.

      • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why is this? I’ve never used docker before and when I set up my server a couple years ago, I installed Debian, Apache, and MariaDB and got everything set up relatively easily.

        • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          The problem is when one app requires a different apache(or some other random requisite) version than the other one, docker just deals with that so I don’t have to. That’s what I like about it.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Dependency hell is self-inflicted, but sparkle-junkie devs are complicit: it’s their fault they don’t know of long-term-support enterprise OSes and don’t use one as a primary port.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              But it also keeps the junk in a near little area which I can easily get rid of.
              No need to look up how to do a clean install.

              I would say it’s purpose can be used like a live-ISO of an OS.

          • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I actually just had to deal with this! So, I ended up spending time troubleshooting and rewriting some .conf files for Apache.

        • madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because with docker you don’t even have to install and setup Apache and MariaDB. You run one command and it knocks out that whole process. Not go mention the security implications of completely seperating your software.

          I can also speak from experience when I say it makes development and delivery of software soooo much easier. As a self hosted software developer I can promise you that if I created an instruction set to deploy the software I build bare metal rather than just containerizing it. No offense to fellow self hosters by any means, but if I require a multi step instruction set rather than a one liner docker command I will get more issues. Humans make mistakes, and when I can automate it out with container orchestration it absolutely makes it easier for the user.

          • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I appreciate the response! When I set out to self-host, I made the decision to install everything separately, because I heard about docker and it sounded like, “plug in code and run”. And that’s something I didn’t want, only because it was a hobby and I wanted to learn more from a hands on experience. I learned a ton, sorting through those errors! If I did it over again, I’d probably use docker, based on your explanation, but I feel like that is an endeavor, in and of itself.

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      For me it’s Bitwarden, hosting their stack in 2018 right after getting my first job launched me into everything else.

  • jacecomix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pet peeve: had to check “Other” and write “None” several times but otherwise fun little survey. Results should be fun to look at.

    • gmalette@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can also not answer questions by clicking next without an answer. I chose to understand “None” as skipping

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There was one question where it wouldn’t let me do this. I think the media streaming question I had to click “Other”.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Definitely going to fill this out once I get some free time. What will the data be used for?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Mine started that way, with Linux + BTRFS RAID + samba, then I added minidlna, then Jellyfin, then a bunch of additional services.

        I think the survey should distinguish between an off-the-shelf NAS (Synology, TrueNAS, etc) and DIY, ask about filesystems/RAID (ZFS, BTRFS, EXT + software RAID, hardware RAID, no RAID).

        • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.gardenOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not sure that’s where I’d draw the line. Imho you have a server that also serves as a NAS. Before getting an explicit machine, my “NAS” was just NFS shares on my Proxmox host, which was also used to run all my VMs. It was backed by ZFS, but I don’t see how that’s relevant for it being a NAS or not.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I was confused by the wording. It said something like, “do you have a NAS device on the network?” I don’t have a dedicated NAS, I have a device that provides NAS services (samba share, RAID, etc), as well as a dozen or so services (source code forge, budgeting app, etc). It’s all one device in my case, except for a handful of other services hosted elsewhere.

            When given a yes or no in the middle of the survey, I’m left to guess what qualifies as a NAS device. I call mine a server that provides NAS services, though it was originally a NAS-only device (that’s why I bought the drives).

            I’ve been in several online discussions where people claim I don’t have a “NAS device” because it’s not a dedicated device, and some even claim it needs to be something off the shelf like Synology to count. I think what trips me up is the word “device”.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I did not even consider that NAS might refer to a commercial device.

          Making a raspberry pi host an always on hard drive with Samba and calling it Network Attached Storage was the first thing I ever self hosted.

          Language is weird how it changes.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The first thing I did was throw drives into my PC set up samba and minidlna so my SO and I could stream video to the TV.

            But in an online discussion, someone made the argument that it needs to be a dedicated machine with unattended updates with providing storage as its only purpose or something to that effect. That seems overly limiting to me, but that seemed like a pretty common sentiment.

            Surely there’s a line somewhere between someone making a share on their PC or attaching a USB drive to their router and a commercial NAS device. I don’t know where that line is, so I tend to be pretty conservative and assume a NAS device is dedicated to the purpose, whether DIY or purchased, but if it runs a bunch of other services, now it’s a “server” and not a NAS.

            That’s why I’m suggesting the language here be more precise.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      “No”

      – everyone using compose to orchestrate software deployments

      spoiler

      Yes it is, and there’s a age old joke about docker being used for configuration management, which doesn’t require a container system.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I said yes. Then it asks what platform you use and I clicked “Docker”.

      • rmrf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        It asks this regardless of whether you say you use orchestration or not. I would say that docker compose, used as intended, is not a container orchestration platform as it provides no automated scaling or resiliency across nodes