Here is my Proxmox server:
free -h
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 125Gi 66Gi 33Gi 24Mi 26Gi 58Gi
Swap: 8,0Gi 0B 8,0Gi
This is on my Framework Laptop:
free -h
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 58Gi 3,3Gi 47Gi 82Mi 8,6Gi 55Gi
After facing backlash earlier this month, PayPal PYPL +1.9% rescinded a line in its policy stating that spreading misinformation on the platform would be subject to a $2,500 fine. Today, the remaining language leaves users and elected officials demanding more clarity over how the platform defines fine-worthy speech.
A part of PayPal’s user agreement that says any customer in violation of the platform’s “acceptable use” policy is subject to a $2,500 fine has been in place since at least 2013, according to the website’s archive. The fine had largely gone unnoticed until earlier this month when PayPal updated its acceptable use policy to state that messages which are “fraudulent, promote misinformation or are unlawful” are in violation of the policy and, by extension, subject to the fine. The “acceptable use” policy stated that determinations of which messages violated the policy would be made at “PayPal’s sole discretion.”
After drawing intense backlash from commentators stating that the policy could infringe upon free speech, the company rescinded the line in the policy citing misinformation and issued a statement saying it was posted in error on Monday, October 10. “PayPal is not fining people for misinformation and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy,” a spokesperson for the company said. PayPal’s former president David Marcus was among dissenters, posting a tweet objecting to the policy update, which was amplified further when Elon Musk responded “Agreed.”
“PayPal’s new AUP goes against everything I believe in,” Marcus’ tweet reads. “A private company now gets to decide to take your money if you say something they disagree with. Insanity.”
The note about misinformation was removed from the acceptable use terms, but the $2,500 penalty for violations remains, causing continued concern.
PayPal’s website still lists “provide false, inaccurate or misleading information” under the “restricted activities” portion of its policy. Violating the “restricted activities” portion does not result automatically in the $2,500 fine that breaching the “acceptable use” agreement does, but it may still result in charges, account suspension or other punitive actions.
Unfortunately for PayPal, now that the $2,500 fine has landed in the public eye, it has fallen under close scrutiny. “Concerned about this language still in PayPal’s terms of service – it’s vague and seems like it could be weaponized to control speech,” Representative Tom Emmer (R - MN) wrote in a tweet on Thursday.
The ordeal has spurred a call for people to delete their PayPal accounts with #PayPalCancelled and #DeleteVenmo gaining momentum on Twitter. Where the policy finally lands may be especially relevant to PayPal’s Venmo, a peer-to-peer payments network with a social media feed where users share messages attached to their public transactions.
I Don’t Forget, I Don’t Forgive… https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilymason/2022/10/27/after-paypal-revokes-controversial-misinformation-policy-major-concerns-remain-over-2500-fine/
That was the moment I already deleted all PayPal accounts. To never return back.
I personally switched to Floorp on my desktop/laptop systems. And Waterfox on mobile (Android).
Well you said:
but that’s the best that can be done on chrome
And I think the best use of such a plugin is actually to use it on Firefox. Since Firefox (or Firefox forks) still support Manifest v2. So actually ad-blocks on Chrome are worse, because Google created Manifest v3, which sounds newer… but it ACTUALLY worse. Manifest v3 basically disallow developer to block ads effectively. Just in the name of kugh kugh ‘privacy’ or ‘security’… Don’t get fooled by Google here!!
SO please do not use Google Chrome, they are killing ad-blockers by the introduction of Manifest v3. More info: https://www.xda-developers.com/google-chrome-manifest-v3-ad-blockers/
Fork of Firefox
Not my problem xd
uh… no… The add-on was also developed for Firefox, which still have Manifest V2. Because of the headache of Mozilla, Hill decided to stop development for Mozilla and only release the latest (signed) add-on via github, without further updates. The developer just makes a statement that it’s getting so worse to develop for Firefox that he just doesn’t do it anymore.
THe developer also don’t want to develop uBLock Origin Lite. Mozilla is sucking all energy out of people.
I’m very happy that I moved to Floorp.
You are 100% correct!
When governments are corrupt; rebellion is the same as criminal, because you are going against the government. That is the whole problem.
I see. I’m not native English. but I get it.
No such thing as introducing features with 0 performance impact.
Roger that
Nobody knows about Mbin yet?
Here you go:
-`
.o+` user@intel4004
`ooo/ ----------------
`+oooo: OS: Arch Linux BCD oriented
`+oooooo: Host: Intel 4004 @ 740 KHz
-+oooooo+: Kernel: 0.0.1-custom
`/:-:++oooo+: Uptime: 3 hours, 12 mins
`/++++/+++++++: Packages: 3 (pacman)
`/++++++++++++++: Shell: sh 0.5
`/+++ooooooooooooo/` CPU: Intel 4004 (4-bit) @ 740 KHz
./ooosssso++osssssso+` Memory: 0.64 KB / 8 KB
.oossssso-````/ossssss+` Storage: None (Using Paper Tape)
-osssssso. :ssssssso. GPU: None (Terminal Only)
:osssssss/ osssso+++. Display: None (TTY Only)
/ossssssss/ +ssssooo/- Network: None (Hand-delivered punch cards)
`/ossssso+/:- -:/+osssso+`
`+sso+:-` `.-/+oso:
`++:. `-/+/
.` `/
I see… but you only use 15GiB… Or are there days you actually use up the memory?