Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywayimagemessage-square246linkfedilinkarrow-up1747arrow-down135file-text
arrow-up1712arrow-down1imageWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywayNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square246linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDarorad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up53arrow-down1·3 days agoMy issue with gnome isn’t the software itself, it’s the project refusing to coordinate with crosse desktop protocols and refusing to implement anything that doesn’t 100% line up with their vision even if it makes the rest of the ecosystem worse.
minus-squarechonkyninja@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down31·3 days agoIt’s called a blackbox and it’s considered a good API design.
minus-squareEugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoIs this ironic?
My issue with gnome isn’t the software itself, it’s the project refusing to coordinate with crosse desktop protocols and refusing to implement anything that doesn’t 100% line up with their vision even if it makes the rest of the ecosystem worse.
It’s called a blackbox and it’s considered a good API design.
Is this ironic?