Starfield's hype handle cranks ever-more furiously in the run-up to its September release, and Bethesda has now fired o…
  • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
    1·
    1 year ago

    Yes but they had an incentive to stay with it. It’s actively profitable. Whereas with star field not so much

    • acastcandream@beehaw.org
      2·
      1 year ago

      Starfield isn’t even out yet you’ve already decided 1) it’s bad 2) it’s broken and 3) it’s abandoned.

      I’m not sure what in their history indicates to you they’d abandon it. That one is particularly weird to me.

      • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
        1·
        1 year ago

        I’m just concerned and will wait for reviews before buying (like everyone should). Bethesda has a reputation for being slow to fix games and having lots of bugs and crashes at release. And even then, they patch them up to being playable and leave the rest for modders to fix.

        What makes you think they stick with their games? They fix bugs for about a year or so after release and move on, just like any other studio. They fix stuff in re-releases but you have to pay for that.

        • acastcandream@beehaw.org
          1·
          1 year ago

          Every fallout has received DLC/updates for years after release. Skyrim has its fair share of DLC as well.

          I’m not preordering here or anything but I think it’s reasonable to reserve judgment for when the game is actually released?

          • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
            1·
            1 year ago

            I was reserving judgement. Just giving reasons to be cautious going into this. Everyone should still be excited, I’m just saying “expect a Bethesda game” so look at their recent games and that’s what you’re getting into probably. With those expectations, you’re less likely to be disappointed