• schroedingershat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The only way to feel safe. The really big ego-support vehicles are no safer than a subcompact to be inside of, but they are far more likely to kill your own family.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well sure, though not being able to see anything around you when deep in truck/suv traffic is pretty scary in a sedan.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s a feeling, not a lack of safety. Intimidating people into buying big cars on purpose is still vile, but the people who cave are giving in to irrationality and putting their feelings above the safety of their kids and of others. Tragedy of the commons is when defecting improves your utility. The SUV/emotional support truck arms race is only decreases the utility of others in exchange for feelings of power.

          • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which does not override the lack of safety of a tall heavy vehicle. Small cars are not less safe than emotional support trucks and full sized SUVs, because the latter get specific exemptions from safety regulations.

            “I’m going to increase the probability of killing my kid, innocent hystanders because of this one specific critereon i’ve cherry picked” is an emotional argument.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The feeling of power and safety, itself, has utility. Feelings matter.

          No argument that there’s been an active propaganda campaign to make people in smaller cars feel less safe, but propaganda works. You can’t just dismiss it.

          • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can object to it being used to justify killing kids for a feeling though. Which is what you were doing by suggesting it’s a prisoner’s dilemma.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Object all you like? It doesn’t change the actual reality of what is happening and why people drive murder machines.

              • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Now you’re dodging the point. You’re spreading the harmful propaganda, and using the fact that it’s effective to justify spreading it.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I edited my original comment to make my point clearer - you’re right that larger vehicles don’t actually make anyone safer.

                  I maintain that the illusion of safety is, itself, the motivation for why people are buying these vehicles. That’s not a cultural thing, but rather, an irrational and instinctual thing. As long as these huge vehicles are allowed on the road, everyone else is terrified into buying their own. Statistically a large murder machine doesn’t make you safer, but being able to see the road when you’re surrounded by other huge murder machines will make people feel safer regardless of culture.

                  You aren’t going to get these things off the road by shaming people. We have to make them illegal.

    • biddy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Physics says that in a collision, the heavier vehicle will always come out better. Higher mass means more resistance to acceleration, so it will take longer to change speed and impart less force on the occupants. This is one reason why buses sometimes don’t have seatbelts, when the bus collides with much lighter cars it will be largely unaffected.

      If everyone has a heavy vehicle, it’s worse overall because of higher kinetic energy causing more dramatic collisions. And obviously significantly worse for everyone outside a car.

      Hence the arms race.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is offset by the lack of safety regulation, high center of mass, heavier weight to crush the cabin in a rollover, and much higher likelihood of running over your own kids.

        Stop spreading propaganda by cherry picking,

        • biddy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is offset by the lack of safety regulation

          Citation needed. SUVs tend to be modern which would generally have stricter safety regulations

          high center of mass, heavier weight to crush the cabin in a rollover

          I wouldn’t have though that rollovers are a common cause of deaths or serious injuries in cars. The higher center of gravity is going to be offset by the wider wheel base, so it depends on the car.

          Traction seems like a much bigger problem, although many SUVs solve this with bigger wheels.

          and much higher likelihood of running over your own kids.

          Agree 100%

          Stop spreading propaganda by cherry picking,

          Look, fuck SUVs, obviously. If you aren’t a psychopath you should not feel safe driving those things. My point was specifically about the physics of collisions. What you’re bringing up can’t be answered with physics because it depends on the details of the car, we need real world statistics to continue this conversation.

          • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Buy a new big car because it will be later year than a new small car and thus have newer safety features” is an incredibly wild way of drawing the exact opposite conclusion to the one you should have from that data.

          • Uranium3006@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Citation needed. SUVs tend to be modern which would generally have stricter safety regulations

            what? that makes no sense. SUVs in the US are generally regulated as light trucks, which have historically had laxer safety requirements for a given model year