cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 16 days agoJunior Prompt Engineeringimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1763arrow-down18
arrow-up1755arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 16 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareOrvorn@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up86·16 days agoSomeone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up40·16 days agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·15 days agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up23·15 days agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squaremaiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-215 days agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·15 days agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.