For what exactly?

Anything. One example of Xi being held to account disproves the description of an unaccountable dictator.

Obama dropped bombs

“The president has, in this capacity, plenary power to launch, direct and supervise military operations, order or authorize the deployment of troops, unilaterally launch nuclear weapons, and form military policy with the Department of Defense and Homeland Security.”

Yes, for these actions the president is accountable to no-one for 4 years.

Should be easily proven by giving an example of Xi being held to account.

Wrong prophet.

The NFL

It has only existed in a colonialist form.

There are examples of kibbutzs outside of Israel. Colonialism is not (necessarily) part of the ideology.

I disagree. The ideology of a kibbutz is not Colonialist.

Colonialism certainly helped establish some settlements, but is colonialism essential for the survival of the kibbutz system? I don’t think so.

For example, if a kibbutz was initiated (legally and paid for) in Australia, then colonialism would not be an ingredient.

I would argue that the Colonialism and indigenous eviction evils can be separated from the socialist successes.

Yes, some kibbutz founders were part of Zionist settlement land grabs. And there is no way I’m going to defend current Israeli actions.

But this doesn’t really relate to the kibbutz being a good example of communism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz

There used to be an accompanying salute

Single or return?

OK then, I’ll make sure to only watch the Musk hate videos.

1 mile, straight up.

OK. I see.

I think this occurs most when a mainstream source mixes opinion and fact. People hear the opinion, over time it turns out to be incorrect so people move away from the mainstream.

When a fringe commentator states an opinion that later turns out to be incorrect, those errors are forgiven (or forgotten) or a similar replacement fringe content provider is consumed.

Other people still lying to you, but it’s just randoms online, they’d never lie like govt or the MSM

I’m still not getting it. How does this lead to right wing? Why can’t conspiracies lead to left wing support?

Why should they lead to any particular political persuasion?

I agree. My point was that rich people don’t take payday loans, but i recognise that not being able to afford a safetly cushion doesn’t necessarily imply bad planning.

Payday loans sort of suggest this. Bit it’s more how society is biased to keep poor people poor.

Why the link to conspiracy theories?

Why would knowledge of MKUltra or the Iran–Contra turn someone right wing?

$ sudo apt install €$¥