Simple, but effective. Liked the meme in the readme
Simple, but effective. Liked the meme in the readme
Did you end up posting any implementations to ticalc.org ?
No, this isn’t war funding, this is funding for NGOs that help people who have been left with no home and no food due to the war.
The article is way longer than it should be
It’s kind of stupid this even has to exist tbh
Knowing if a command failed and capturing stderr (which contains stuff like error messages) are not the same thing.
I checked the docs, and I’m a bit confused with one thing. They show that you can capture the stdout of a command into a variabe, but they never show stderr being captured. How would that work?
You have to put /s
in the end, because people in this day and age can no longer recognize sarcasm, probably because we all spend way too much time on the Internet.
So what they are saying is “game companies are and should only be forced to do something if they promised the consumers the games would be playable forever”, am I right?
Turns out he calls it a laptop chip troughout the article, but that title makes zero sense with what the article is talking about. And it’s not like the article shows a lot of new information, it’s just like “oh, look, x86 emulation on ARM!” What a clickbait article.
Apparently this III initiative has its own Bilibili channel… I don’t know if this could be a clue for what kind of games they might be releasing or not…
Maybe they’ll release a non-complete port of the game at April Fools
One side of me is asking “Seriously, who thought that dividing a day in 1000 units would be useful?”
The other side of me can’t wait for me to start saying to my friends “A’ight, meet me at @960”.
rhythm game Geometry Dash
It’S nOt A rHyThM gAmE, It’S a MuSiC vIsUaLiZeR
End-to-end encryption is the best possible safeguard against Meta snooping on your data.
This has always been my biggest pet peeve with WhatsApp. Yes, they might encrypt it all and the encryption might be practically unbreakable, but what worries me is what Meta might do with the private encryption keys. Lem me elaborate further.
I'll start by trying to explain how key-based encryption, the type of encryption WhatsApp uses, work at their core, for those who don't know (THIS IS GOING TO BE AN OVERSIMPLIFICATION). Imagine you want a friend to send you a message with super sensitive contents. Here's what you do to guarantee that no one else can read it but you:
This means that, if someone else manages to get the encrypted message, they will need the private key to read what it says, but they don't have it, only you have it. The only thing they can do keep guessing what that key is until they find what it was and read the message, but that can take up to millions of years, even using supercomputers.
As you can see, this works really well for sending messages without anyone but the sender and the reciever knowing what is being said, and that's why it's so used in encrypted message apps…
…but what if Meta has access to the private keys? I mean, what if, after WhatsApp creating the public and private keys for messaging, the private key is retrieved and stored in Meta's servers, making them able to read all the messages you receive?
Can someone with more experience in the subject say if my concerns are valid?
I’m sorry for you.
I can’t play the video, it seems to have been corrupted
Lego Star Wars imo is the best one by Traveller’s Tale