I didn’t understand this. He said the bickering between C and rust devs reminds him of the vim/emacs debate.

You could. But instead you’re doomscrolling on the fediverse.

Nice writeup. I was surprised by the lack of performance of the Bevy solution, especially the fact that it didn’t scale. In fact I was a bit saddened Bevy has no existing way it doing fast whole-objects collision detection.

Yeah. Believe me most of these embedded controllers are not very well programmed. Play a bit with fake certificates and I won’t be astonished if you to catch something.

Very nice ! That’s when you can start spying on your car’s behavior.

Not consumer minded. Citizen minded.

Regardless of the very subject of the post, linear types and do.. final constructs would be a welcomed addition.

Warning: in the first case “value” is actually a shared reference, not a value.

You could argue that C++'s new is Rust’s Box::new, and delete is replaced by RAII. Same concepts but way better ergonomy.

I find it’s a mix between ML languages and C++, and knowing one of them would help yes. If you’re tired if chasing a wild pointer because of a subtle use-after-free in a multithreaded monster under gdb, you’ll love #rust.

That’s a hell of a comment !