I agree, this is an anti-pattern for me.
Having explicit throw
keywords is much more readable compared to hiding flow-control into helper functions.
I agree, this is an anti-pattern for me.
Having explicit throw
keywords is much more readable compared to hiding flow-control into helper functions.
Yeah, idk, ive never actually used win 11 and have barely used win 10. It just a meme.
That’s right. Let’s return to basics, to the first programming language we learn as developers: Pascal. Well at least I have, I assume everyone does too.
/s
That’s a valid argument, but a very weak one. If we are not completely sure something is an improvement in all aspects are we just to dismiss it altogether?
Maybe search for this on kaggle? Or scrape Wikipedia?
This is the major reason for me. I really liked yaml, because it is way more readable to me than JSON. But then I kept finding new and more confusing yaml features and have realized how over-engineered it is.
Yaml would be great language if it had its features prunned heavy.
They’ve lost potential revenue, but that is not the same as if amazon would come to their house and had stolen their only rucksack prototype.
Potential revenue is not your property.
It still sucks though.
Oh, i have to try these out to see if it effects my development cycle. I do notice that cargo check is super fast, but cargo build takes a long time. So codegen and linker could be the source of slowness.
I would like to believe that say amphibians would adapt eating flies or other insects if mosquitoes are lacking.
For a clean build: number of cores (because cargo builds each crate dependency in a separate process), for a build of your crate only: single core perf.
Bees, wasps, ok, got it.
But mosquitoes? I’be yet to find a biologist that would advocate for preservation of mosquitos. Kill them with fire.
This is all hard to do because it is hard to determine people’s race on lemmy. Some usernames give it away but most don’t. And I don’t go snooping trough their post history to find that out.
Giving them access to Jellyfin is not fully “copying” a movie, it is just access to streaming (they can download, but that’s on them).
Overall, this makes little sense anymore and I feel that limiting data sharing is hard to conceptualize, let alone prevent with regulation.
All responses are saying “it is illegal”. But is it more illegal than pirating a movie for yourself only? Would it still be illegal if you would have paid for the movie? In that case it seems like lending the dvd to a friend…
Can you expand on this wild claim? The whole point of containers is isolation so what you are saying is that containers fail at that all the time?
That’s cool, post a link here when you’re done, I want to see what you cook up.
Good, we have been in a drought of js frameworks lately: https://dayssincelastjsframework.com/
Joking aside, that’s your selling feature?
It started as actual unpublished technical descriptions of underlying technology.
Why would you not be upgrading due to a new feature of python? You don’t like new features or was that a badly wordered sentence?
Documentation should be generated from code imo