There is an almost daily submission like https://lemm.ee/post/11169186 that reminds everybody that Brave is problematic but they seem close to handling donations and subscriptions.
Is another option needed or could Brave be adjusted into something that can be supported? Would it be enough if that problematic guy left Brave?
That's where you have to do things that don't scale. Which content has to be put on peertube that boosts growth? It's something for a new answer.
Do you know who is running piped.video?
That's the question. How can reach or content be increased?
What can be done to strengthen peertube so that adblockers aren't needed at all?
Why do you quote Google? Wouldn't a more reputable source be more appropriate?
What are the biggest showstoppers?
I am not going to argue that after my joke tanked that much.
The child enters the cave and goes to school. The father will play the same game with himself and drive to work in his new Freelander.
I feel slightly offended for owning an off road truck
That was at times of DES. Cryptography that is used today is proven to be complicated enough that it's unbreakable unless the government got quantum computing working at sufficient skale.
Like others wrote, attacks will happen when the messages are received and decrypted.
I don't object the creation. I just want to know why there is that discrepancy.
I have been browsing /new since about a week and this is the third anti-brave submission that I see there.
Why are there daily posts against Brave but not against other browsers? Is Google more trustworthy than Brave?
If you like conspiracies you could ask yourself how much work on Firefox could have been done if Mozilla had invested their ad billions globally.
Billionaires are not the main problem. You only have a people's court when the plebs are united. When the plebs are united, votes can change politics.
Blaming billionaires makes people wait for a revolution instead of taking responsibility right now.
You know that there won't be a revolution.
They can be upset. As somebody seeing the post on the all-channel, it's strange that they start and finish the post with pointing out the lead dev when there is no clear sign that he is involved.
You could try to change the browser ID string that is sent with every request.