It’s about normalizing the higher price point for next generation.

Funny way to say, “release at a price point the market will bear”. The scalpers shown nVidia that the market is willing to pay more, close to double. If the market pays that, then guess what, it’s not ‘normalization of higher prices’ it’s ‘market rate’.

<inAnAlternateReality>

Elon did a thing.

People said “That’s a nazi thing”.

Elon immediately said “No, I didn’t do the nazi thing.”

People said “we don’t believe you”.

∴ Elon is a nazi.

If you have only one party on the ballot and it’s a fascist party, you don’t really have a democratic choice do you? You can either vote for fascism or not vote for it.

If you have a fascist party on the ballet In an ONLY TWO partys political system, you don’t really have a democratic choice do you? You can either vote for fascism or not vote for it.

¡I made you and I can destroy you! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkPogqVWiPg

<types in safari> But what about Apple?!?! Can’t they strong arm this?

So what it boils down is companies are going to try to cut off their user base if they don’t view ads? People will complain they can’t view their page and cancel their subscription? Nobody’s going to willingly install a browser that won’t let you install an adblocker, right?

Can someone explain how the server is going to know whether or not the client browser is showing the ad? A stealthy browser would say, “hey yeah send that ad so I can render it to the user” and the server says, “yeah ok” and then <doesntRenderAdOnClientDevice>. How is the server going to know whether the ad is displayed or not? Don’t current gen adblockers not even retrieve the asset? If the asset was retrieved but not displayed, how (if even) can this be monitored?