True, but only because it actually is. Except weirdos who saw php code 20 years ago say it sucks.

Everyone who writes C# uses Nuget.

There’s no Java past version 8. Everyone knows that.

Congrats! There’s no feeling like leaving your abusive family behind.

Just curious, what’s in the torrents?

Anyway, leaving your jobs to have time for your side project is exactly how we get another core.js story. Read that dude’s story.

I mean, OpenSCAD has primitives which you use to create your own shapes. It does have chamfers, if you add a module for that. Or download someone else’s code.

I prefer parametric SCAD models. Maybe because I’m more of a developer than a designer.

SCAD allows for really cool things like I did with a parametric calendar model - you just input the year and it automatically calculates the first day of the year using a clever algorithm. It also works with leap years automatically, which is less cool but still very convenient.

These are not free.

Honestly, you already have the image locally if you’ve pulled it.

I guess not everyone treats their PC as an ephemeral storage, huh? I don’t trust anything that’s available only locally to survive.

Can’t you just buy it, write a review, return it?

Hannah Montana Linux btw?

Well, time for some review bombing?

Nah, sounds complicated.

Not watching the video, but here’s an answer for the clickbaity title: no, it’s not. It’s not officially supported and outside of a few enthusiasts, no one’s gonna use it on a Windows handheld.

cat ~/.ssh/* perhaps?

On Printables you can filter by license.

I use ssh regularly, I just use a different key for each server. And thus I don’t use the default name (id_rsa) because it doesn’t make sense.

Here you go!

~ $ cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa
cat: /data/data/com.termux/files/home/.ssh/id_rsa: No such file or directory
~ $ cat ~/.ssh/id_ed25519
cat: /data/data/com.termux/files/home/.ssh/id_ed25519: No such file or directory

Few years ago or so some billionaire said that no one should die a billionaire and donated his money. Or something like that, I don’t remember the details clearly. Though I’m not sure it’s what you’re after as he’s done so when really old.

1. For all the mentioned cases, if your firewall blocks incoming packets by default, no one can access it, no matter what is the source of the port being open.

2. You don’t configure it on the docker level, at least if you care about outside connections. If you mean from your local computer to a docker container, by default you cannot connect, unless you expose the port to the system. If you mean from other docker containers, just create your own separate network to run the container in and even docker containers cannot access the ports.

3. I usually use netstat -tulpn, it lists all ports, not only docker, but docker is included. docker ps should also show all exposed ports and their mappings.

In general, all docker containers run on some internal docker network. Either the default or a custom one. The network’s ports don’t interfere with your own, that’s why you can have 20 nginx servers running in a docker container on the same port. When you bind a port in docker, you basically create a bridge from the docker network to your PC’s local network. So now anything that can connect to your PC can also connect to the service. And if you allow connection to the port from outside the network, it will work as well. Note that port forwarding on your router must be set up.

So in conclusion, to actually make a service running in docker visible to the public internet, you need to do quite a few steps!

• bind a port to your local host
• have your local firewall allow connection to the port
• have your router set up to forward connections on the port to your machine

On Linux, local firewall is usually disabled by default, but the other two steps require you to actively change the default config. And you mention that all incoming traffic is dropped using UFW, so all three parts should be covered.