oh no, but com5 is one of my favorite words! literally unusable.

thank god it’s not case sensitive holy shit. i don’t understand the kind of person who would see that as a positive.

the way this was framed i thought they were using like cameras and shit to detect vaping. it’s just the fumes?

yeah lol fuck you, don’t smoke.

also i don’t care whether it’s for kids or not. no one should smoke. breathing air wherever you are is a right. fuck your smoking.

edit: i think some smokers or vapists may have misunderstood what i meant by the comment above. to be clear, fuck all of you who vape or smoke anything anywhere another human being breathes. you disgusting, smelly cunts.

i hope that clears any misunderstanding ♥

until he fucks off soon. the whole point of genocide Joe comments is that people don’t want four more years of him.

but of course thankfully Harris says she’ll help the genocide too so we’ll see how that goes.

you’ve stopped seeing comments about Biden once he became irrelevant?

this isn’t pedantry. you fail to understand basic concepts. you claimed bribing politicians is the same as shoveling money into the government’s mouth, when it’s the exact opposite. paying taxes is giving government money. bribing politicians so you can get subsidies and tax cuts is sucking money from the government. if you can’t tell the difference, which is like night and day, that’s not on me.

first of all, a government official? i didn’t say government officials aren’t politicians. i said the politicians aren’t the government.

second of all, context clues:

we were talking about money here, so guess what, I was talking about money too. the government’s money is your tax money. and money rich people give to the politicians doesn’t go to the government, it goes to the politicians themselves, otherwise you couldn’t buy a politician. billionaires and corporations don’t give money to politicians so you can get more public services.

politicians are not the government; people are the government. they give politicians money in exchange for larger tax cuts and subsidies. that’s taking money from the government, not giving it any.

small government means less taxes and regulations, so small government for corporations. it’s still big government for the people though.

meanwhile they say the other side is for big government when that’s the side that’s against government in your bedroom, government in your doctor’s office, government up your genitals, government establishing and dictating religion, government asking papers at every turn, a god-king president being above the law, and on and on…

bullshit terms made by people who want to control you and give their buddies more money.

except it’s the other way around?

you’re asking why fascists and leftists have different standards and morals?

it’s fine; it was ambiguous, but the context heavily suggested that they were saying it to mean they’re tired of seeing it on bad lists. no worries :)

i have 4 boxes labeled A to D, and 10 rocks.

i put 1 rock in A, 2 in B, 3 in C and 4 in D.

A[⚪] B[⚪⚪] C[⚪⚪⚪] D[⚪⚪⚪⚪]

i then paint 1 rock in B, 2 rocks in C and 1 rock in D.

A[⚪] B[⚪🔴] C[⚪🔴🔴] D[⚪⚪⚪🔴]

then i put the boxes in a bigger box called the united boxes.

here’s the rate of painted rocks:

1. C 66% (2/3)
2. B 50% (1/2)
3. United boxes 40% (4/10)
4. D 25% (1/4)
5. A 0% (0/1)

that’s their point; it’s clear that their state is one of the top ones

there’s no evidence they’re losing money. the assumption that piracy is lost sales is one made by execs and we all know they don’t know their asses from their elbows.

why are all texts in different fonts

i love that it was replaced in 1942. it’s like they waited to see whether it was even necessary to change or maybe it would work out anyway.

going by what you think constitutes “intelligence”, I’ll consider that a compliment.

yeah but that just doesn’t work. fiscally conservative policies inevitably result in inequalities and preserve a hierarchical structure that keeps conservative norms intact.

tbf liberalism is still a right wing position so i shouldn’t say the term is entirely inaccurate, but it’s generally used in the aforementioned lowercase-l libertarian sense, as if someone can be fiscally “right wing” (preserving inequality) and socially “left wing” (promoting equality). that simply cannot be achieved. you cannot achieve equality by preserving inequality. you’re still authoritarian.