That will never…
…oh no.
That will never…
…oh no.
I mentioned it before:
If they use any GPL code for their model then any output would be a derived work and a violation of the GPL.
Not really applicable here: Schadenfraudacious
You should have left it.
It sounds more threatening & my reply makes more sense. It was a good typo.
I’m sure you meant conscience, right.
Right?
Well, it is a real image. I’m just not sure how it was created.
Once again I cast my vote for SpOnGeBoBcAsE. Pascal & camel cases are for the weak.
Not phone specific, but signal had a great blog post on cellebrite a while back.
1: yes
2: Normally derivative works are patched or modified versions of the original. I think the common English meaning would apply & chatGPT et al are fucked. I doubt there is a precedent for this yet.
From the article:
Also, in 2022, several unidentified developers sued OpenAI and GitHub based on claims that the organizations used publicly posted programming code to train generative models in violation of software licensing terms
They can argue about it not being a copy all they want. If there is a single GPL licenced line of code scraped then anything they produce is a derivative work & must be licenced GPL.
nice.
Bold strategy, lets see how…
…oh. oh no.
I lIkE tHe SpOnGeBoB sArCaStIc CaPs.
CamelCaps has met it’s match.
Include me in the screenshot
Surely in a liberal democracy enfettered capitalism is restrained by laws. I think a big problem we have now is a combination of regulatory capture & (sometimes AI generated) targeted, emotional, populist advertising by political brands.
Cough: Blackstone KKR etc.
“we have been trying to contact you about your car’s extended warranty”
Also whether non-smart versions will remain an option.