I’ve always taken it to mean: put your effort into making it work first, before worrying about optimization. Once it works, you can decide whether it’s worth putting effort into optimization. But if you do that first, you might optimize for the wrong thing. Or get distracted by optimization so you never get it to work.

Can we get Ludic to do this? Not a Brit, but he does have a way with words.

Ooh! I need to look that up.

I recently wanted to send a file from Linux to an old tablet over Bluetooth. Can’t be done apparently. I can send it to my phone, a windows laptop can send it to the tablet, but my Linux PC apparently can’t. Still baffled about it.

The first is fine. The ending is great, some other parts are bad. Some are very questionable. On the whole, I enjoyed it.

SO used to be really good in the past, but these days when I’m looking for an answer to a problem, I only unanswered closed questions.

Ah, is that the way to address that? I don’t run into incorrect error highlighting often, and it’s mostly great, but when it gets it wrong, it can be very stubborn about it.

To the contrary, it’s Lisp with a lot of syntactic sugar to make it look more like C, but underneath it’s nothing like C. It’s a weird hybrid.

“You mean you want it to corrupt your data and end up with conflicting changes once you share it?”

That was fun. Apparently I’m a JetBrains Mono user. Of course it might be simply what I’m used to, because I’m a long time IntelliJ user. It wouldn’t surprise me if this is already my font.