None of that is “Python”. You want to learn a language and automatically know everything there is to know using Math?

TBF, I don’t even remember why I stopped using the daemon. But it’s currently 3 seconds, so I dislike it… but not so much that I’d prioritize solving the problem versus complaining about it on the internet…

Anyway, I’m adding the server into my DE’s startup. Thanks for the reminder.

The idea that social structures have a “logical end” is pure hubris and have no basis on reality.

The problem is not encoding the result.

The problem is that you need some support from the language to make it easy to deal with. Otherwise you’ll get into go-style infinite if (err != null) handlers that will make your code unreadable.

It has Evil if that’s your thing :)

I dislike that it takes way too long to boot, but IMO the defaults are just fine.

In C++, ignoring anything that any other language provides…

I mean, yeah, if your language does not support error values, do not use them.

It would be much better if it stopped missing the version of the code you are working on and locking while starting multithreaded code.

Unless I’m missing something in particular you’re talking about.

No, I’m really asking that. I’ve heard about “rolling coal” happening, but the other ones are hard to imagine. (To be fair, rolling coal was also hard, but it’s well evidenced.)

People only discovered that multi-layer non-linear neural networks work at the 90s. It’s not really reasonable to equate perceptrons with the stuff people use today.

Do those things actually happen on the US? Because they all look like things that happened once and the media run away with them.

It is easier to understand a foreign language when it’s spoken slowly (well, not too slowly).

The loud part is just for the benefit of the speaker.

Recreating photosynthesis is the easiest part by a huge margin.

Whether you decide to define it as synthesizing ATP or glucose, both a simple molecules that we can create in a lab. Everything else is the hard part, there is a huge amount of “things” on that “everything”.

Even if nobody finds a way around, that would be incredibly expensive.

Yep. That’s the answer. That’s all the information the OP has available.

When you enter an apostrophe, and the site returns a 500 response stating you are trying to attack it. (And yeah, it’s always 500, not 400.)

As a techie, I can say that’s a hot research area. There isn’t much useful stuff in it.

Is there a site that transparently evaluates software and publishes its findings?

Well, you just found the Mozilla one. It has told you their findings.

That’s a valid point.

There are two kinds of good serialization languages, the ones where values are black boxes and only serialize the data structure, and the ones where everything is completely determined and can be turned directly into an API.

JSON is neither, but it’s closer to the first than YAML. XML is the first, while the SOAP standard almost turns it into the second. TOML is about as close to the first as JSON.

TFB, the numbers are not defined as 64 bits floats.

They are just not defined. At all.

The end of line also has semantic meaning. Both indentation and eol are whitespace.

Haskell supports both semantic whitespace and explicit delimiters, and somehow almost everybody that uses the language disagrees with you.

But anyway, for all the problems of YAML, this one isn’t even relevant enough to point out. Even if you agree it’s a problem. (And I agree that the YAML semantic whitespace is horrible.) If YAML was a much better language, it would be worth arguing whether semantic whitespace breaks it or not.