• 2 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 6th, 2024

help-circle




  • uBlock is a content filter. Cookies are set when a server responds to a web (http/https) request. So if uBlock has a domain blocked, not only are any cookies blocked, but no requests make it to that domain (whatever.com) at all.

    If a domain is not blocked by uBlock Origin’s filters, then cookies are set per your browser’s configuration. Firefox I believe blocks some 3rd party tracking cookies by default, but can be configured to block all third-party cookies as well, but this may break site functionality like single sign-on.









  • Here’s the list of states and electoral college votes:

    https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/allocation

    Just don’t think about the popular vote. It has no bearing on who wins the Presidency in the US.

    You can argue that it should but just accept that under the current rules it does not.

    As far as your question “If Kamala wins the popular vote, how much does she have to win by to flip the electoral college to her side?” the only answer is “it depends”

    It depends because as amazingly stupid as this sounds, one vote for a candidate counts either more or less depending on which state it came from.

    Example of California (most people) and Wyoming (least people)

        California:
            Electoral Votes: 55
            Population: 39,500,000
            Weight:  0.00000139
    
        Wyoming:
            Electoral Votes: 3
            Population: 580,000
            Weight:  0.00000517
    

    A vote in Wyoming (0.00000517) affects the outcome of the electoral college much more than a vote in California (0.00000139).

    Another way of looking at it is that one electoral college vote in California represents the will of a little over 718,000 residents, while in Wyoming it represents the will of a little over 193,000 people.

    Things get even trickier when you factor in the fact that some states split the EC votes based on popular vote or district, and other states are a winner-take-all (whichever candidate takes the state takes all the EC votes.)

    It’s a giant complex mess and it cannot be easily related to the popular vote.






  • I understand the concerns of privacy, but working in academia means that you give up some of the privacy.

    Yes people will have your real name and they will know what college you work at and if some crazy person decides that they want to stalk you on campus because you’re woke or part of the deep state turning the frogs gay with chemicals they’ll be able to easily do that.

    You’re gonna have 100s of strangers in your classes during the year. You’re going to tell them exactly when you’re going to be in your office for office hours.

    If you are unable to handle that I doubt academia is for you.

    Academia is about furthering human knowledge especially a PhD. There are sacrifices involved; your privacy is probably one of them.


  • Part of being an academic is being available to discuss your publications. Your full name will not only be flying around the internet but recorded permanently in libraries and journals.

    Science is about collaboration, and standing behind the work you do, publicly. You will find it extremely difficult or impossible to get your PhD without being known to the academic community.

    I think you won’t find many anonymous scientific papers held in high regard.