Same for me: just say no, and they say OK. Effortless but the option is totally invisible.
The irony is, I’ve seen the staff stop using the face scanner for everyone halfway through the line to speed things up. So its not saving time, just costing money to increase surveillance.
Ignore the name (neural networks might as well be a footnote). A more appropriate title would be “generic problems and algorithms”.
(Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach by Russell and Norvig)
I agree, and here’s a few different avenues of examples:
If trying to get past interviews, Leet code and hacker rank can be great. They’re not so great for real world problems, but not bad.
Advent of code is a good middle ground between theory and practice in my opinion.
To really learn real world problem solving, I’d recommend implement a specification, without looking at existing implementations. For example, make a basic regex engine (formal Regular Expressions not PCRE expressions), or try to implement the C Preprocessor, or the JS event loop.
“Algorithms to live by” https://www.amazon.com/Algorithms-Live-Computer-Science-Decisions/dp/1627790365
Less technical than you probably want, but it is useful for mapping real world problems to known algorithms.
Yeah, cookies, account logins, and other stuff make it hard too. Ex: randomly exploring gmail emails at different times of day, but not actually marking emails as read.
Psychology. Ever see ring doorbell footage where the owner says “drop the package” and people do? Its not like the owner could do anything, but for some reason it makes people behave differently.
Here’s a very similar question I asked here a few months ago: “Privacy respecting ring doorbell” https://lemm.ee/post/8165932
The clients are source available for telegram though
I mean technically the client is verifiable if you use discord in a browser tab… and verify it every time you load the web page… 🙃
OP can you add “unmedicated ADHD” to the title to be a bit more (but still not totally) accurate
(I know I’m two months late)
To back up what you’re saying, I work with ML, and the guy next to me does ML for traffic signal controllers. He basically established the benchmark for traffic signal simulators for reinforcement learning.
Nothing works. All of the cutting edge reinforment algorithms, all the existing publications, some of which train for months, all perform worse than “fixed policy” controllers. The issue isn’t the brains of the system, its the fact that stoplights are fricken blind to what is happing.
If you paid a true professional to sit down 1-on-1 with you everyday for 6 months, and you are good at learning I think yes, for most but not all software positions. But unless you’re forking over $200k I don’t think any professional dev is going to do that for you.
Cool, this is exactly what I was hoping to learn but couldn’t find. It sounds like its still a pretty manual process, but thats okay. If thats how it is righ now, then thats exactly what I want to know.
I’m considering making tools (GUI local app, but also website AUTH frontend/backend tooling) to try and make systems like this more commonplace and standardized. I didn’t know about revocation keys, so I’m glad I heard about that before trying to build my own.
Nailed it
Yeah, sorry I incrementally edited the title before posting and accidentally made it make no sense. I meant publicly announce that a private key was compromised
I don’t see anywhere in his comment(s) where he says something postive about privacy guides.
This could actually be a pretty big deal
Labeling datasets is costly process. When you dont opt out, you’re letting them build a labelled dataset on you-specifically for free.