Apologies, I thought I’d seen 60 seconds but since looking I’ve found a bunch of guesses from “every few” to numbers with nothing that looks like a source in headlines.
Going to the source, I found:
are taken every five seconds while content on the screen is different from the previous snapshot.
Should have searched first, sorry!
I suspect you’d have a hard time training anyone to use software based on (say) a screenshot every sixty seconds. May be wrong.
Online mode seems closer to the worst, with a screen to kick you back to the main menu.
Once back at the main menu, due to the way all travel resets areas, you’re likely to have lost progress since the last gate. You’ll retain items and XP, but lose map reveal and have to run through the areas again.
Thanks! Some fun bits!
What sort of control tuning have you done?
I mean, give folk a few years and it’ll be something to add to the “you can’t assume X about a name field” list.
Picard Musicbrainz is pretty awesome for recognising and then moving-to-the-right-place. I think it can also be automated, but I haven’t got to that level of trust yet
I’ll be honest, I’ve not watched the video - but the thumbnail alone is either clickbait or misrepresenting the game.
Which C25K app is that? I’m using one that sounds less good! Would be interested to try that one.
https://www.argos.co.uk/product/6836577 example of a charging dock, there.
For what it’s worth, I think the £30 was a theoretical amount for the “everything video” service.
But yeah, as a mashup enthusiast I’m resigned to the idea that it’s never going to be well represented on streaming as a genre due to the concerns around licensing.
PlexAmp and Plex (and a few other things, I guess) are my solution, but it still means that link sharing with friends is an awkward mess.
I think you’re on the wrong community for this question.
The thing regularly referred to as “AI” of late is more accurately referred to as generative AI, or large language models. There’s no capacity for learning from humans, it’s pattern matching based on large sets of data that are boiled down to a series of vectors to give a most-likely next word for a response to a prompt. You could argue that that’s what people do, but that’s a massive over simplification. You’re right to say it does not have the ability to form thoughts and views. That said, like a broken clock, an LLM can put out words that match up with existing views pretty darn easily!
You may be talking about general AI, which is something we’ve not seen yet and have no timeframe for existing. That may be able to have beliefs… But again, there’s not even a suggestion of that being close to happening. LLMs are (in my opinion) not even a good indicator or precursor to that coming soon.
TL;DR: An LLM (or generative AI) can’t have or form beliefs.