I don’t understand why, legally speaking, a distinction is made.

You don’t understand why the law distinguishes between a piece of digital art and Photoshop itself? Come on, dude.

The beauty of open source is that, if people find it useful, they will improve it :)

As with many things, it can be contextual. For instance, it might be pertinent to know that the person with whom you’re discussing climate change is a flat Earther.

I also am curious