Better for the company doesn’t necessarily mean it’s worse for you.
Better for the company doesn’t necessarily mean it’s worse for you.
But where does the extra money and infrastructure come from to provide everything they need?
What is money in the first place? It represents labour and resources. So when a new person shows up, they themselves provide the money in the form of their labour. They are the money.
If you replace the cars first, such that no one’s daily schedules are significantly altered,
Is that going to happen if you replace cars with another vehicle that still requires car infrastructure?
Doesn’t sound that weird. More people means more people to serve, so more service jobs are needed.
I don’t see how going from car to proper city planning is any harder than going from not-car to proper city planning. This just feels like an extra unnecessary step that could be taking resources away from the city planning part.
The majority of Mozilla’s income comes from advertising for Google
There are so many different types of tofu and different ways to prepare them that all taste vastly different. That stuff is basically a blank canvas.
Very fair, which is why we should be critical of those who make the opposite claim and use that as justification for their hatred of AI.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to have a stationary bike generator at home to help charge a proper EV car than to have it built into the vehicle? That way, you have one device that you can mass produce and that will be useful for everyone, including those who don’t need a vehicle of their own.
Everyone’s arms hang at different heights. There’s no way to design a static bag that fits everyone.
Loop the handle around the back of your wrist to shorten them.
Yep. It’s part of their mating ritual. You can learn more about it at c/fuckcars.
Whole food is generally preferable, but protein powder is absolutely fine if that’s the best you can do. Just take the route that’s easiest to adhere to. You’ll get much bigger benefits from simply hitting your macros than optimising their source and micronutrients and all that other jazz.
It’s very Calorie dense and not very filling.
“Calorie in” means what your body absorbs. If it absorbs more, then the number is higher for the same amount of food, and vice versa.
Someone still had to make the decision to put all of these elements together in one characters.
Considering that both were designed with the same historical period and location in mind, that’s not surprising. But the hood? And parkour? That can’t also be a coincidence, can it?
This scenario is very different from what I understood from your OP. I’m pretty sure that in the majority of the world, this would be legal. It’s what we call justifiable homicide.
Microsoft is working very hard at getting into this data game. Don’t think they won’t try making similar deals.
I suspect a big part of it is that he actually acknowledged that people are having problems, while Hilary decided to go “America is already great” as if their problems aren’t real.