Who care how someone else uses the bathroom.

Your questions.

1. no. That’s silly. If you are doing #2, you do both sitting.

2. yes, but decades of practice mean I can stand and pee in nearly any mental state

3. reasonably clean. I’ve good aim and we clean the floor regularly

4. to crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the women!

I’ve gotten my last 2 jobs through LinkedIn. I know it doesn’t work well for some fields, but for tech it is great.

Similar to you, but I also hate the advertising industry with a burning passion and want to deprive them of any and all data possible.

This description sounds extremely hirable. I’ll take 5 please.

To be fair, this is describing all advertising.

Piracy is not stealing. Piracy affects artists.

These two statements can and do coexist.

Few exist, but they do exist.

The issue is that many times in the past when men have tried to creat men only groups, they get called sexist and forced to open the group.

Men aren’t allowed to discuss their issues (men’s rights discussion is seen as hate), they aren’t allowed to discuss that they aren’t allowed to discuss men’s issues ( this is seen as hate ). Because men are seen as privileged.

I fully expect hate for this comment and I won’t engage.

My 2012 MBP says otherwise. This thing is a rock and will not stop!

I’ll say the same thing I say at the airport.

“I would like to opt-out please”

Unfortunately many of these platforms treat a block as an interaction.

There is no way to ignore these posts without triggering an interaction.

As others said, it is truly the goal of these sites to make you angry.

The same person that asked you to respond with this nonsense.

Millennial Americans will cook, if it isnt too complicated.

GenZ Americans won’t cook unless it is putting something in the microwave.

Mind linking to a post discrediting the “official is bullshit about Tiananmen square”? I’m genuinely curious about the counter arguments.

Having had win11 installed for approximately a year, my default browser (Firefox) has never been changed by an update.

Exactly my thoughts.

This reads like a paid “review”. Or an extreme naive reviewer that somehow thinks 3 hours is enough to judge a game as the best ever made.

It is unfortunate that this is what you have decided to take away from the blog post instead of reflecting on the criticism I have provided.

This is a serious problem across Lemmy(and elsewhere). Someone makes a reasonable argument and the responses will all pile on either something in the users comment history or one sentence in 5 paragraphs that they disagree with.

When this happens on a topic with which you have expert level knowledge, it is so blindingly obvious and eye opening just how wrong every other conversation may be. It strongly suggests having a highly critical eye on any topic.

Because I knew someone would take the bait. The saudis did it is another conspiracy theory from the time.

The conspiracy theories around 9/11 are almost as numerous and as fun to play with as JFK assassination.

As I said with the very first statement, I don’t believe any of this.

why not just fund the terrorists and ignore warnings?

This is exactly what many tinfoil hatters thought and probably still think.

I didn’t actually believe this, but it was fun to entertain the idea.

Here’s why. At the time, there were a bunch of very odd coincidences. I’ll do my best to remember the best of them.

• The CIA/NSA (one of the “secret” agencies) put out a budget report showing a large amount of money that was not trackable, in the billions.
• Coincidentally, the section of the pentagon hit by the “plane” was reportedly where financial records were stored.
• By “plane”, I mean object. If you watch the 1 video that got out (all other videos were confiscated) from the nearby gas station, the thing that hits the pentagon does not look like a plane but instead a missile.

Next!

• reportedly, the owner of the twin towers took out a massive insurance policy against the buildings the day or week before 9/11 (I forget exact timing)
• also, the building was covered in asbestos, the cost to remove was in the billions, and the cost to keep the building occupied always also increasing

Next!

• building 7 (I think that’s the right one) collapsed under what appeared to be demolishing conditions
• building 7 was never hit by a plane or anything else, it just dropped like it was purposefully demolished

Edit: forgot one!

• the towers were obviously hit by planes, we have plenty of video evidence of this. The controversy is around how the towers actually fell. This is where the “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams” meme comes from.

There are more, but it’s been 20 years and my memory is hazy.

Overall, there were some oddities around the whole event that, when allowing yourself to think completely outside of reality, make sense as to why it was an inside job.

Finally, personally I believe the Saudis did it in cooperation with Bin Laden and their goal was to bankrupt America. They did a pretty good job, from their perspective.