• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle




  • If you’re lucky enough to successfully create an account on Oracle Cloud, you can also try Oracle Cloud Free Tier. You can have free ARM64 x4 CPU and 24 GiB RAM totally free of charge. There might be problems with availability during VM registration, but there are scripts that automate spamming for checking every 80 seconds.

    I’ve been using it for 2 years and it’s great. However be aware that your VM might get erased if you have a free account. That too can be remedied if you update to a premium subscription (You still get Free Tier resources without a charge). Nobody has reported an erased VM on a premium plan yet.

    Still, I am pretty sure they can erase it if you do illegal stuff with it. I’ve been using it only to host Minecraft Server, as well as other services using Docker. So far so good.



  • gornius@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldShould I move to Docker?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Learn it first.

    I almost exclusively use it with my own Dockerfiles, which gives me the same flexibility I would have by just using VM, with all the benefits of being containerized and reproducible. The exceptions are images of utility stuff, like databases, reverse proxy (I use caddy btw) etc.

    Without docker, hosting everything was a mess. After a month I would forget about important things I did, and if I had to do that again, I would need to basically relearn what I found out then.

    If you write a Dockerfile, every configuration you did is either reflected by the bash command or adding files from the project directory to the image. You can just look at the Dockerfile and see all the configurations made to base Debian image.

    Additionally with docker-compose you can use multiple containers per project with proper networking and DNS resolution between containers by their service names. Quite useful if your project sets up a few different services that communicate with each other.

    Thanks to that it’s trivial to host multiple projects using for example different PHP versions for each of them.

    And I haven’t even mentioned yet the best thing about docker - if you’re a developer, you can be sure that the app will run exactly the same on your machine and on the server. You can have development versions of images that extend the production image by using Dockerfile stages. You can develop a dev version with full debug/tooling support and then use a clean prod image on the server.




  • Ok, if I remember correctly, YouTube barely generates, but generates nonetheless revenue for Google. There are many ways to make more money without fucking over its users by cutting costs:

    • downgrade old videos with small watch count to 720p30

    • make people pay for hosting >1080p60 content

    • do not allow private/unlisted videos

    • straight up remove 10h looped videos - they take so much space, but are technically spam - both for bandwidth and storage

    And my go-to solution: focus on sponsorships as main source of revenue. They are the only ads I can tolerate and are actually effective from my experience. YouTube can just take a cut from every sponsorship on YouTube video and everyone will be happy.


  • gornius@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlPlease, do not use Brave.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago
    1. Chromium has tons of eyes on it, because it's codebase for many other projects, such as Electron and any chromium based browser.

    2. Web integrity wasn't discovered through chromium source code, but it was openly proposed by Google on separate Github repo, dedicated solely for that proposal.

    3. There are many shortcuts in your thinking that just the code being open makes it trustworthy. Every PowerShell malware technically has its code open, because it's a script. But you wouldn't open a random script from the internet, without checking what it does, yet you don't apply the same logic to Brave. If you don't check the source code yourself, you either need to trust an author, or third parties that "checked" the code.

    4. In addition to that, you're probably using compiled binary, which means at this point you can throw that source code out from window, because at this point you can't be sure compiled binary == source code.

    5. Due to the enormous amount of code, it's really easy to obfuscate malicious behavior. At the scale of the browser it's more efficient tracking outbound packets that program sends than examine source code.


  • gornius@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlPlease, do not use Brave.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Brave behaving like Win XP era browser with gazillion toolbars installed, with a pinch of crypto and crypto promoting ads should be a giant red flag.

    FOSS =/= trusted by default. Why are there so many FOSS evangelists, but such a damn tiny part of them are programmers, let alone programmers able to examine a source code behind such a giant codebase as web browser?

    I use Vivaldi, at least their business model is clear, and developer is kind of trusted, and not crypto scammer and homophobe.







  • I don’t even hate Apple that much, but what I hate is that every time I find out somebody I know uses Apple product I say to myself in quiet “Oh gosh…”, because very often the reason they use Apple whatever is to feel better than somebody.

    And I hate people like these. Not every Apple enjoyer is like that, and there are legitimate reasons to go Apple, like wanting that ecosystem, good camera, using something that just works or go with Apple Silicon revolution. And no, Apple is not really private.

    But in most cases their reasons are either a fucking IM bubbles (because I don’t want to spend 5 seconds to install an app that works anywhere) or it just “doesn’t lag” (which any phone over $200 doesn’t) which is obviously a fucking bullshit to cover the actual answer which is “I wanted to feel better by having shit that every fancy person uses”.

    But the funniest people are the ones trying to explain these “amazing features” to me, totally ignoring the points that IM sucks on Android because Apple pushes their own standard and refuses to use open ones, that no sideloading and Apple controlling whole app ecosystem is the best thing ever and that Android is slow, because it [put any argument Apple fanboy without the basic OS concepts understanding would make] and not because you used $100 phone and switched to a motherfucking $600 phone. Wow, who would’ve thought?