Indeed, I don’t dry those sections.

B, A, C2, C3, C4, C1, D.

Any one who displays both the Gadsden flag and the thin blue line flag is teetering on cognitive dissonance.

Indeed

deleted by creator

My network is .milkme and I have nipples… will they approve it?

It’s biased.

Gender is not a relevant consideration for the Democratic Party.

Nope

Well that was a mistake. Apple hardware is designed to run Apple OS.

I think it’s a weird to assume the wiki-link that you posted is in support of the “Christ Myth Theory” (as they call it).

Read the contents of the wiki link you sent and check all of the citations, you’ll see that the Christian Scholars that contributed to writing the article aim to dismiss the theory by citing their own books.

I’m not debating with you the question that was asked as to start this thread. It’s visible to literally anyone that looks it.

If you wanted to answer a question that was not asked by the OP, that’s on you.

Eminem claimed to be a Rap God though. Praise be onto him.

You suck ass at reading. The title of this post is asking about “Jesus Christ,” which we all know to mean the son of God and the guy that resurrected after 3 days.

Jesus Christ is very specific. Jesus Christ, the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day… that is fake.

Seems likely. There’s probably a Rabbi named David somewhere today too.

I didn’t say the second one used “that name.” Read what I wrote.

I didn’t provide any article. I read the one you linked.

In this most recent response, you are annotating sources from 93, and 117. Those years are notably (at minimum) 60 years after the supposed resurrection; and as such are not first hand accounts.

They very likely was someone named Jesus, because there were many people with that name. There was very likely someone named Jesus that was crucified, because many people were crucified. There’s 0 evidence or recorded documentation that a resurrection ever happened. That’s the big one.

Wait… you mean to tell me there’s not a collective of atheist Wikipedia writers that have dedicated their lives to the absence of religion and citing themselves on refuting evidence on Wikipedia?!?

Wouldn’t it be weird of every Wikipedia article on the historical validity of Jesus was written by Christian scholars that have dedicated their lives to their religion? It would be wild if they were just citing themselves in these Wiki articles in order to sell some books, wouldn’t it?

It’s almost like Christian Scholars (people that have dedicated their entire lives to this idea) have access to write for Wikipedia too…

The citations are from the same people we see over and over again on this topic (specifically on Wikipedia).

There were a lot of people that shared that name, and a lot of people were crucified at that time.

The article you provided (if you read it) should actually serve to cast more doubt on the idea; it does not “answer the question to the affirmative.”