Is it like the magical feudalism destroying sword?
Is it like the magical feudalism destroying sword?
There’s a Dodger Stadium Express shuttle you can take from nearby Union Station.
There’s also an ongoing effort to build an aerial gondola between the station and the stadium, but as usual the NIMBYs would rather more people just drive.
The best solution, of course, is to close down the stadium entirely because I don’t like baseball.
Beta was not better than VHS. Anybody could build a competing VHS machine, and it supported feature length films.
I would go so far as to say that yes most choices do end up with the best one being used, because people like nice things. Programmers just aren’t persuasive people in general, give it time.
They can handle the truth once they start serving us the same pages.
What if we keep replacing the leaders with new people from the bottom?
authoritarian rule
This is why
If anybody here is an engineer, I’d highly recommend applying for jobs at tech startups. It’s very chaotic and disorganized; you’ll be constantly putting out fires. But you know where you’re at when you’re putting out fires? Flow state.
I like it this way. It’s not an “echo chamber” because we do have some interesting liberal vs leftist discussions. I think I’ve already heard quite enough conservative nonsense though; they aren’t entitled to my consideration forever.
They tried that once themselves, and would go back to their old ways if they could.
What kind of maniac uses it in a sink after using it in a toilet?
Jerry Seinfeld is a strong supporter of theocracy.
If you’re not willing to learn how taxes work, then you should stop trying to spread that ignorance.
And yet, it wouldn’t be 30% on a lot of Californians. The ones who would pay the most are landlords who would not be financially ruined. You need to read the Wikipedia article.
It’s fortunate that increasing California’s taxes by 30% doesn’t necessarily impact a lot of people, then.
Land value is different from acreage, so your house would see very little increase in taxes.
I’m not evangelizing the woke narrative at you. This is just how land value taxes have always worked.
Ok but who cares? We should increase them even more than 30%.
Why not substantially? The surplus from land ownership is “unearned income” - we’re basically giving a goverment handout to landlords right now. Land value is different from acreage, so your house would see very little increase in taxes.
Because we can dramatically increase taxes for those too. Land value taxes don’t distort prices and we’ve barely scratched the surface.
Abolish the corporate veil! Their children and children’s children deserve to go to public school.
That explains the “virtue signaling” accusations.