deleted by creator
deleted by creator
+1, the IRC days were glorious
I would say a group making a decision that applies to everyone inherently involves some people’s preferences being inflicted on others. All the electoral college does is shift that power from one subgroup to another. You can argue that you prefer that we give more weight to lower population areas to balance their influence via the electoral college, and others could argue that it’s better to maximize overall representation via a popular vote. But neither of you could claim to eliminate “someone far away deciding things” for some people.
It’s implicit that the question is about a chicken egg, specifically.
Do they still make non rotating microwaves?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Is jellyseer similar to overseerr?
In 1995 people thought Win95 was incomprehensible.
Ive been hearing this since 1995
If by show you mean Rings of Power, I think the fan consensus is that it’s crap. Even in the kindest opinion I don’t think you could call it “just as good” as the Peter Jackson film trilogy.
Yeah, it looks like it. Kind of ruins the message.
deleted by creator
You’ll have to forgive us, the article was written by an LLM
Distributing to others is “more illegal” than consuming it yourself
In general, I believe a two woman ticket would get fewer votes than a woman/man ticket, which would get fewer votes than any male-led ticket. The misogyny effect is strong. But it really depends a lot on the specific people.
It’s more or less accurate, except at the top where the red team guy is respecting a woman.
I also vote for PBS Space Time
They will definitely use this ruling to allow a president to do criminal things. Obviously.
Only for plural nouns, IMO.