Baggins [he/him]

The battery life is already not great when running anything intensive. Can’t imagine being able to make anymore sacrifices there without making the thing useless.

If you read the article, those “ifs” are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo’s BS patents all makes sense.

I actually saw this on YouTube last night and I thought his microscope is super cool.

Dunno. Compilation errors. Google just says they haven’t patched it for the new kernel in Testing/Unstable right away

I’m on Debian Sid and it just fails to configure the kernels because the Nvidia module won’t build. I’m stuck on 6.9 for now.

My DKMS doesn’t even compile 550 with 6.10.x

love large and properly formatted data files

You’re thorough with a great attention to detail.

The developer specifically released the light version because they acknowledged that it is not the same and you need to make the explicit choice of what you want to keep using

Yes but the difference is one of them is also going to help you fix it.

deleted by creator

Maybe I’m just not understanding what AI-enabled hardware is even supposed to mean

You don’t need AI enhanced hardware for that, just normal ass hardware and you run AI software on it.

You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.

I think I’m good 👍

Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?

They’re probably just using CGNAT.

The server must have to send some metadata to the client telling when it’s running an ad because there are other things that need to happen client side during that like adjusting of the time or making the ad clickable

It’s going to be hard for them to live up to the original N64 version. Perfect Dark Zero was terrible.

I think you could say an animated loading UI is “essential” since it conveys to the user the program is not frozen. Maybe you could implement a “simple” loading animation if the default one is exceptionally flashy.

1st paragraph of the WCAG linked by OP:

unless the movement, blinking, or scrolling is part of an activity where it is essential;

And further down:

Note
An animation that occurs as part of a preload phase or similar situation can be considered essential if interaction cannot occur during that phase for all users and if not indicating progress could confuse users or cause them to think that content was frozen or broken.

Even further down:

A “loading” animation
A preloader animation is shown on a page which requires a certain percentage of a large file to be downloaded before playback can begin. The animation is the only content on the page and instructs the user to please wait while the video loads. Because the moving content is not presented in parallel with other content, no mechanism to pause, stop or hide it needs to be provided, even though the animation may run for more than 5 seconds for users with slower connections.

Haha I had one of those way back when. I know people always hyped them up but I thought it sucked. Could have been a skill issue idk.

Right? Like how dare someone try to help me make my product better!