• 4 Posts
  • 1.28K Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 22nd, 2024

help-circle
  • It wont win over some mythical “everyday home computer user” because they dont exist anymore.

    I don’t even know what you’re talking about. The vast majority of people are interacting with a workstation on a daily basis. The only mythical users are the ones that exclusively use phones and tablets.

    For Linux to truly “snowball,” it needs a serious, fully seemless office replacement

    No one uses Office applications on their local machines anymore. Everything is done in the browser.

    Matter of fact, a large majority of all work is done in the browser. Computers have, for a long time, been glorified Facebook machines. Look at how many people use Chrome OS that doesn’t even support any local software at all…








  • Each individual level of the print is called the print line

    It’s called a layer.

    “So on the firearm, I’m seeing from the trigger guard—maybe print line 200—and the top of the magazine well—print line 400—the marks are staying consistent,” Garrison said.

    …I don’t even understand what that’s supposed to mean? “The marks are staying consistent”? What marks? Consistent with what?

    Even if they were able to match a print to a nozzle (which they won’t be because it’s a wear item that’s constantly changing), nozzles are cheap and replaced often. You replace them in 2 minutes.

    However, none of this will stop DAs from trying to use this shit as evidence, just like all the other junk science they pay people to lie about.





  • Then you’re just going to be at the mercy of the people that do run these things

    I wasn’t asking for a way around them, I’m asking why they exist and suggesting we collectively move on from them.

    I realize maybe my response was taken as disagreement

    I didn’t take it as a disgreement, I took it as a dismissal. Rather than discussing why it’s necessary or whether it should be removed, you suggest that I create my own alternative.

    As a product owner I’d want a way to contact

    You can. We’ve already been over this. Send them a message on the platform.

    or validate a user

    How is an email address validation? I can spin one up in 3 seconds.

    Self service password reset

    You’re just creating a security vulnerability.

    I’m not trying to defend email, just curious what mechanism could take its place.

    Again, I already explained this.

    Some platforms only require a username and a passkey (not even a password). That is ideal, in my opinion.

    Email is also used to track user activity across the web, and while you know whether or not you will be tracking, collecting, and selling my activity, I don’t. Removing email eliminates that concern.

    Some sort of cryptographic signature might work

    That’s called a Passkey.

    though I would have to think carefully about no separate communication/ confirmation channel

    Again I ask, why? What is this fixation on multiple communication methods? Maybe as the user I don’t want you to have other ways of contacting me?

    If you really need it there are hundreds of alternatives.


  • It’s all of the above at once. It’s hard to think of another identifier that hits them all.

    I already gave you one. The username.

    It’s not a communication method outside of the platform it’s on.

    Why is that necessary?

    It looks like your complaint is as a user, not the service owner?

    My complaint, as someone who hosts a variety of services, is that setting up an email server is ridiculously complicated, costs money, and is completely unnecessary.

    Recently Ghost updated their software to add 2FA for email. Not TOTP or Passkeys, or anything actually secure, those are still unavailable. After updating I was completely locked out of my own account because it was trying to verify my login using a system that doesn’t exist on my install. It was a super annoying and completely unnecessary problem I had to deal with.

    I wouldn’t run a project like that, but feel free to start one up.

    Great, I’ll just go ahead and fork every open source project in existence on my own to remove this feature using the software engineering degree and the time I don’t have.


  • It’s a communication tool

    So is BlueSky

    It’s a unique identity

    As is 4093rnbgv3q09vn032. Everyone already needs a unique identity. It’s called a username.

    You can have more than one

    More than one what? Email? How about zero?

    It’s platform agnostic

    There are a thousand platform-agnostic communication methods.

    It’s anonymous

    Email? LOL absolutely not.

    It’s transferable

    It’s only transferable if you use your own domain, which the vast majority are not doing.

    What would you propose instead?

    That depends on the purpose. You can receive messages and notifications right in the app, so for the purposes of communication I would propose absolutely nothing.