A: I never suggested anything remotely counter to adblock aps. I simply stated that you must understand you are trusting the dev.
B: Never stated any issue with any of those nor anything else.
C: Quit assuming intent, read what was actually written, and you may learn to understand what is being said.
I am informing that others may make educated decisions and not assume security where none is present. Kindly limit yourself and not others.
the thread is about as blockers. The post I commented to was about learning scripts or trusting a compiled App. My comment was “easy is a trap”. So, no, none of you premise is remotely relevant. My opinion, that you are trusting and not safe when using a compiled app. was the only point I made, the only point I tried to make, and at no point did I make any effort whatsoever to change people’s habits. So, kindly keep your assumptions and insistence upon people playing your idiotic game to yourself.
Again, you assume things and argue against what I never said. My comment was about easy is a trap. Nothing more. Nothing less. Kindly take your posturing and sit upon it.
My likes and dislikes were never discussed in any way. Your entire premise is disingenuous. Assumption does not make something so.
I stated no such thing and a compiled app can only be assumed FOSS, unless you inspected the code prior to compile, there is no way to know for certain what is in it, only what it does.
None of which is relevant to the comment I made. But I contend that the only thing needed to understand scripts and the functions contained is a web browser and the ability to read. I was pointing out that the advice to let someone else do it for you isn’t actually safe.
A compiled app is not FOSS unless you compile it yourself, which, shock of shocks, means need to waste time with scripts and stuff. Sorry, but you are making excuses.
“No need to waste time with scripts and stuff.”, you mean other than learning and knowing what the script does as opposed to hoping the apps’ developers are honest, never die, and never sell out.
Privacy browser and chromium (ie Google) is an oxymoron.
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/144289/privacy-with-chromium
If you choose chromium, you are trusting google with your data. Brave remains nothing but a UI for API calls to google services.
It is a “mostly only exists in the minds of those reporting it” thang just as it was originally. Yup, same nazi fucks posting their teen fascist fan fic last time are posting it this time and just as then, and as always back through time. No one would even know the less than a dozen wack jobs existed if the media didn’t amplify their message for rage bait clicks.
But I was told firefox was doomed because safari is superior to everything???
Johnny Silverhand did nothing wrong.
And spend hundreds of hours fighting the collections they send after you regardless.
“if” caring a lot of water on this here frog’s back mr. scorpion.
Please explain how you remain confident of that “SHOULD” when they are not sanitizing the HTML out?
All observations support it. All reviewed generated bloatware supports it. I’ll stand by my, assumptions, until there is any direct evidence against them discovered.
“framework”, found your problem. Frameworks save time by ignoring how code works. Folks taught upon a Framework have no real idea what its produced code does.
60% acceptance rate baseline? Doubt!