• 0 Posts
  • 82 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle





  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.socialtoComics@lemmy.mlXXX
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sure, but then as I said you’re comparing apples to oranges. You’re comparing the product of human birth to a chicken period, which just aren’t equal.

    In any case, I think this is just gonna go round in circles, so I’m going to stop here - have a good one


  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.socialtoComics@lemmy.mlXXX
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sure that true for a chicken - but a human’s unfertilised egg/ovum doesn’t come with any of that. As such what you’re saying doesn’t make sense.

    The human equivalent of an unfertilised chicken egg is their period, which is what I was referring to above.

    The only way you could get what you said is with a very well past fertilised human egg, and at that point you’re comparing apples to oranges.



  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.socialtoComics@lemmy.mlXXX
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 months ago

    True, but I’d argue the first guy still has a point. Balut is a speciality food item and not mass produced in anywhere near the same capacity as regular eggs - so while you can find them, if you’re buying eggs you’re almost certainly not going to accidentally buy Ballut eggs.


  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.socialtoComics@lemmy.mlXXX
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Most commercially sold eggs aren’t actually fertilised, they’re essentially chicken periods. As such the human equivalent would really only be blood, a barely visible ovum, and any visible remains of the uteral wall that was shed.

    There are definitely fertilised eggs sold (see the photo @65gmexl3 shared), but if you’re literally just buying normal eggs off the shelf, they aren’t going to be those ones.










  • Because it will always take more energy to break the water than you will get burning the Hydrogen in Oxygen back into water - it’s basic thermodynamics.

    You will lose some energy as heat that you cannot get back*.

    You can’t power a car from a process that loses energy. Even if you use a battery to donate the lost energy, then you might as well just cut out the lossy middleman and just run off the battery or generate the Hydrogen elsewhere - which is what we currently do.

    It is better to think of Hydrogen as an energy transporter than as a fuel, as you’d need to generate the Hydrogen somewhere that has abundant energy (ideally renewable), then transport I where needed, such as a Hydrogen powered generator.

    *Interestingly the fact that all processes generate waste heat means the only theoretically 100% energy efficient process is heat generation itself, as all forms of energy eventually degrade to heat (as it is essentially the universe’s waste energy).