• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • The problem is, the way I see it, all energy use is connected. Basically the problem we have is energy consumption grows faster than clean energy production. So requiring more green energy in this context still sucks. Even where I live where all of our energy is green (at least in the grid), extra energy can be sold either via selling it to other provinces/states, or by making deals with companies to do their production here where energy is cheap and green.

    Energy is a commodity on a market. If you use it to inefficiently move people, you can’t use it for other things. Remember that to move a 150 lbs person in a car, you have to move about a ton and a half of car…


  • SolarMech@slrpnk.nettoFuck Cars@lemmy.mlYes, also Teslas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    100 years is ambitious only if you want to remove all of the cars. There are plenty of milestones that can be attained fairly quickly :

    • Smaller cars. Less energy, materials, etc. Safer for other road users (you don’t get hit on your vital organs, better vision for the driver and everyone else since pedestrians can easily see over the car).
    • Less car use is available now, if we just empower the alternatives (make bike usage safe, make public transport good enough)
    • No more cars in cities. Bikes + trains mostly do the job, you can rent a car if you leave the city, or park it at the outskirts.
    • Even smaller cities used to be liveable without a car. This could be brought back, but that’s probably a tough hill to climb.