I think it’s really pretty color inverted! Luckily, I’m not having trouble reading it, either- my eyes thank you.

Not quite, you wanna try again? Pay attention this time:

The question is “What types or brands of edibles make you want to draw?”

ha, gotem

Maybe look up atheism then try correcting your own comment instead of theirs :)

In all seriousness, I think your definitions are a few centuries out of date. It’s been drifting toward meaning a-gnostic instead of undecided. Contemporarily, it’s used to explain one’s believed level of knowledge on a claim. I can, for instance, be agnostic toward plate tectonics, and be made gnostic of them by evidence.

“Why! Do users! Dislike! The use! Of emojis! On Lemmy!?”

Overused, they’re just so tiring too read. I think, if you’re gonna go that hard, just full send hieroglyphics and drop the text aspect.

Well, it was a run-on thought! It really does feel that convoluted when you try and figure it out, but rest assured, you’ve now thought about this in more depth than most conservatives!

I choose to believe no one is this particularly misinformed.

It’s really funny bait, though

“walk the bird” has cursed crossover potential with my understanding of British slang

Are you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.

Now THIS is podracing

IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”

Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?

…nonexistant?

I’m not sure, but as a woman “with multiple personalities” I can say it fucking feels like it sometimes

add a “spend 0 / balance 50” column

This comment section is exactly what my dumbass teenage brain would have needed to read.

sorry you got downvoted, dr satan. your question is inherently kinda yikes but I had the same thought as a teen. it took me a long time to really get why Affirmative Action != reverse racism.

could you maybe explain why instead of only reinforcing the stereotype? I’d be really curious to know what happens to you between your early 20s and your late 30s

The cool thing is that I, a trans woman, am already a woman! Gender is a whole complicated thing, and I think maybe you have a simplistic idea of what it means to be trans. it isn’t “I wish i was a girl” so much as it is “my body/my mind/the way society treats me (some, all, or none of these) is wrong” so, from that perspective. it’d be pretty invasive to force change onto people without their consent-it’s their body, after all!

I think offering physical changes individually to trans people would be the most ethical approach. Everyone is different, and everyone wants different things. TMI but I, as an example, have no interest in bottom surgery, but am happily on hormones.

It’s important to remember that this is just one person’s opinion, too. Take it with some salt, and feel free to ask any follow-up questions if you’re interested in my perspective

A what-i-verse?

The number 100 is one number. Do you mean how many digits? 3 Maybe how many numbers between 0 or 1 and 100? It would depend.

Maybe it would help if you rephrased your question?