Good luck, they’d have to ban nuclear subs and no nation wants to throw that protection away.
Also fuck Greenpeace and their often more harmful than helpful stunts.
Good luck, they’d have to ban nuclear subs and no nation wants to throw that protection away.
Also fuck Greenpeace and their often more harmful than helpful stunts.
The bot is bad and jonsjava is a real piece of shit just by themself.
No, yagi directionals point at the drone broadside.
It’s for bulk building drones you have into the faces of occupiers, good enough is necessary perfect is not.
GE universal remotes did this and still do. They’re like $8 on Amazon.
Yeah the first Tom Holland Spider-Man has a protagonist that was a union guy who spent his savings trying to keep his business alive but buying the alien tech cleanup contract. The government under Tony starks direction takeover the cleanup and fail to repay the union guy who then turns to theft violence and eventually murder.
Sneakier, just add legitimate disability documentation into the relevant system and bump yourself to the front of the interview/validation process.
It’s a crime sure but not a particularly harmful one and if you never get caught you still get what you actually want without having to feel to terrible about breaking a law since it’s government ineptitude that got you into the situation in the first place and civil disobedience is legal and an exceptionally drawn out process for cities and states to fight.
Why? I’m super not into shutting down our cleanest form of energy when there isn’t enough of a cleaner replacement.
Not as good as the little people ones though.
You’ve created the lizard lounge from reddit dude, you’re basically limiting a sub to power users and saying it’s a good thing. It’s not.
You’re being obtuse.
You again agreed 750 miles are owned by the federal government, where in my last comment did you read anything other than 750 miles.
No you’re implying it my saying Amtrak’s existence, federal ownership and greed are somehow totally unrelated to each other.
Go ahead, you’re not making particular sense anyway though you do seem to actually get the point.
As far as I’m aware both the recent large accidents were due to lack of maintenance due to lack of regulation spurred by greed and costing lives.
Because it’s income is not insignificant. How is this not obvious, of profit is the motive to reduce regulation then profit is relevant.
Sure, most of the rail aside from the 750 miles we both agree is 100% federally owned. You’re being obtuse.
Why do you believe a for profit company ran by the government has any less motivation to have limited regulation for the purposes of making a larger profit.
This isn’t hard you’re just being dumb.
Clearly. The amount is irrelevant, the incentive to not be regulated to make more profit is the save as any private company but private companies don’t own and control regulatory agencies, the federal government does.
You didn’t, and haven’t. You’re simply shitty at connect the dots. Apparently perverse incentive to you is a ok.
It’s not relevant because they do not do hazmat at all, Amtrak rails are shared with commercial rail often including hazmat.
Yes you can, I can compare an apple and the planet Venus. You’re confusing inability with inanity and you’re still wrong, it’s a reasonable comparison.
Agreed, it was my point and you can’t seem to absorb it and on fact are arguing that the conflict doesn’t exist because “Amtrak small”. The 4 main companies that lobby a regulatory agency soft on actual regulation because of perverse federal incentive.
I didn’t say you did, I said NYC subway is a shit comparison because it doesn’t take part in the subject of the conversation. Tomatoes are delicious too but it’s entirely irrelevant because it’s not related to the subject in any way.
The feds own track that they find federally, are you actually too dense to accept your own position? Then you subsequently explain how exactly rail is publicly funded. Amazing.
They are, its literally called Disney Transport and on top of that they have the cruise line contracts and partial ownership.
The fact it exists at all is my point.
No that’s exactly the problem I think it is. If they’re mandated to turn a profit the federal government then has a perverse incentive to have weak regulation that allows greater profit margins.
Depends on the sub but yeah they do. Lots and I’d go so far as to say most naval bases are the deepest port inland for protection often surrounded by private commercial businesses. Hell the shipyard most of the us nuclear subs are made is adjoining one of the nations largest ports.
They wouldn’t port ban them since that doesn’t actually solve the complaints, it would be exclusion from territorial waters and no one wants to do that. A. because they’re safer B. Because the protection nuclear navies provide is something everyone values C. These things are usually decided between nations not generally by a sole nation.