deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
well, you’re becoming famous :) … interesting articles you got there 😁
Oh, Are you the same Blender Dumbass 2.0 ?
And only if surveillance actually stops all the crime ( which it doesn’t )
When mass surveillance works, you lose your rights, and when it doesn’t work as intended ( which as the government says to protect you from terrorists ), it gets things wrong and it can be too damaging, like when Google flagged a man who sent his child’s photos to a doctor, or when Facial recognition system gets the wrong person, or when a bank algorithm locks someone of their own account due to suspicious activity… etc
So we’re damned when it works and we’re damned when it doesn’t.
Edit: how can I do the math? Do you have any links…
Removed by mod
That’s just wrong when you’re dealing with the government
Drug dealer : Network - Location - Contacts
Facebook : I’ll take all
deleted by creator
Oh boy, I never read the entire thing, but they can decrypt quantum encrypted messages, if that’s true ( and I wish cryptography experts could debunk this ), if that’s true, then the NSA has went too far with this open source honeypot… perfection!
deleted by creator
Just because the tech guy is a tech guy doesn’t mean they have a sense of privacy, or even know what tech can do, harm wise… maybe for them it’s just hardware specs and Windows installations everyday