Sure, but I do think he would be pleasantly surprised by how things turned out. Aldous Huxley saw the future better. This is not a particularly original analysis.
IMO Orwell’s real insight was about the importance of clarity and truth in language, as a protection against political manipulation. That really was revolutionary.
Keep up the good work.
It was a good line but his general prediction was, thankfully, wrong. With caveats, we’re not at all where 1984 forecast we would end up. Humans turn out to be more allergic to oppression than he imagined.
Pro tip: Firefox can do dark mode natively, if you’re ready to accept some ugly websites.
Settings > Manage colors > then set your preferred hues and Override to Always.
It’s blazing fast with zero white flash, and most sites are perfectly legible.
Literally “always”, like every single time you open a website or app? No password manager can make SMS 2FA not a PITA. As for your second point, I addressed that. What if you literally don’t care about keeping data in question private? Individuals have different threat models, different priorities and all of this is a trade-off. It’s not absolute. That’s all I was saying. Anyway, I’m done here.
Yes this clarifies things. In summary, without 2FA:
So it’s a trade-off. If everyone was in the first category, then the obvious inconvenience of 2FA would just not be worth the benefit.
If the password is unique, there’s no risk!
Incidentally: not re-using passwords should be the only responsibility of the user. It’s impossible to brute-force a password through a login form, you need full access to the disk. So when sites complain about poor password strength, effectively they are saying “We don’t trust ourselves to keep our server safe”. Pretty insulting to blame the user for that.
It doesn’t help everyone equally. It assumes you (a) re-use passwords, (b) don’t protect them properly. That’s the case for most people but not all.
And I’m not tied to Firefox if, for some reason, I want to stop using it.
Not gonna happen.
It’s that same mistake textbooks often make of burying the lead in an otherwise obscure reference the reader may or may not pickup on.
Exactly. Thanks for clarifying.
Which begs the question, “What is FIDO?”. To which the About FIDO page replies, literally, “FIDO authentication uses standard public key cryptography techniques to provide phishing-resistant authentication”.
Arrghghgh! Orwell was right about people’s incredibly capacity to write with zero clarity.
More generally, IMO what we have here is a classic case of ELI5 vs “ELI know something already”. I use SSH and manage the keys myself but I still can’t find an answer to this question: is a “passkey” just another word for “the private key in a public-private keypair?”
Whenever I look into this, the explainer always either jumps straight into super-dense technical details, or describes it all in term of metaphors as if talking to a small child. Oh well.
A question, since you sound like you know what you’re talking about. Is this analagous to password-free SSH? I.e., private key used to log in on the basis of a pre-agreed public key?
Hardly matters what you tell Meta if all your contacts are telling Meta the opposite. The phone number ID is the weakest link.
Still needs a phone number. If you use anything other than a burner number, this is the crucial data point which allows Meta to plug you into their monster social graph of the whole world and find out who you know and therefore who you are.
Seafile is not FOSS, as I understand it. But I tried it anyway, since I also found Nextcloud bloated.
In the end I went back to the purest strategy of all: peer-to-peer. My files are synced between devices over the local network using ssh, rsync and unison and never touch an internet server.
I hope the EU fines them for hampering interoperability.
This depends on there being enough greens and liberals in the European Parliament.
PSA: EU citizens, you may still have an hour or so to go out and VOTE. It matters.
Same. Did it in a Waydroid container on desktop. IIRC I created a WA business account using a rented landline number, which is the recommended way to get round the SIM requirement. But the account still quickly got banned. Not gonna waste any more time on it, for me Whatsapp is out.
Sure. I personally find cynicism intensely irritating. It’s infectious so it inevitably ends up poisoning everything. Nobody ever solved any problem with cynicism. In fact I’d go further: all the world’s backward societies (i.e. most of them) are characterized by all-pervasive cynicism (“they’re in it for themselves”, “they’re all crooks”, “nothing will ever change”), whereas the successful countries (few in number) are the ones where people have a more optimistic view of others’ motives. Cynicism is so obviously a self-fulfilling prophesy that I struggle to understand why so many choose to indulge it. I’ve heard a theory that it makes people feel better about their own helplessness. Perhaps I’m too logical but I wish people would choose not to wallow in pessimism - after all, nobody can prove anything one way or the other when it comes to the motivations of others. And oddly, most humans tend to trust others that they know personally. Personally don’t see why strangers would somehow be a different variety of human. Rant over.
Cynicism like this is completely unfalsifiable not to mention unproductive.
This is a good question. Phone numbers are increasingly used as de-facto ID numbers, everywhere in the world. That’s because, unlike email, they cost money, and in most jurisdictions you can’t even get one anymore without presenting real ID. So: if you have a second phone number, you can effectively have a second persona for any site or app that requires phone-number ID. Seriously, at this rate, it’s going to be all of them.
IMO the best use-case for this is to quarantine your contact list. That is, keep a separate number for social networks and messaging. The number you give to your in-person contacts will be instantly shared with all their cloud services, whether you like it or not. This is what allows Big Tech to triangulate and discover exactly who you know and therefore who you are. If the cloud services cannot trace a number back to any phone ID in their own books, then they can’t do much with it and you will remain at least something of a mystery to them.