I misunderstood before and I agree.

Now admittedly, $250 is probably fairly low for the amount of traffic we were pushing through Cloudflare. We mainly use CF for the CDN (caching all our static content) and DDOS protection, for which it works pretty well. It’s easy to use and you don’t usually have to think about it much.

Nope. Same article. You’re crazy if you think you can average 7mil visitors a month and stick to the $250/mo plan. It blows my mind that a casino of all things is mad about that and we’ve got people like you so desperate to shit on cloudflare that you can’t see how ridiculous that is.

To use a service tier that they’ve clearly exceeded for quite some time and then act surprised when they’re asked to upgrade. Then to make matters worse they try to play hard ball by mentioning that they’re already talking to other providers. I’m sure the casino this is all for is way more lenient and let’s it’s customers play games or make bets they haven’t paid for.

I’m on CFs side. These guys should’ve known better and 120k from a casino is a drop in a very large bucket.

I agree.

If I’m not mistaken they’ve already been found guilty of this in the US.

Steamdeck(Linux), PC and Android.

Some of these are not the pads you’re thinking of. Carbonaut and Kryosheet are definitely made for high power devices.

I would never shop there again. What a joke.

Logseq

I’m not sure how people still care about this.

Couldn’t Google say you don’t have the right to listen/watch for free and you can’t force them to serve content for nothing in return? Advertising is just a means to an end.

But no one is stopping you from turning off your monitor until the ad is over and then turning it back on.

Honest question. What is the consensus for how services like YouTube should be funded?

I still don’t think that’s how it works even if X would like it to.

Was anyone under the impression that everything on the site was free of malware? Has such a torrent site ever existed?