Those loans are often several times more than the yearly income and done more frequently.
Those loans are often several times more than the yearly income and done more frequently.
Those loans are often several times more than the yearly income and done more frequently.
I wonder what the retort is on the down votes here.
If a loan is acting as income (like it does for the ultra wealthy) then it should be treated like income and taxed accordingly.
I’ve been lucky then.
As sexy as it looks I feel it might look dirty fast.
I guess if you have a lot of communities you follow you’d not want to forget to resub.
I’m tempted to not reply and validate your statement.
I found this post using active and basically missed the conversation, so use new if you want to actually engage with the fellow lemms.
I’m not clicking that and I’m glad Lemmy does not have autoplay video.
Username checks out
I suppose it is fraud. If they do hurt themselves after trying to consume they might end up in an ER and a hospital might be required to report (even if user would not have for obvious reasons)
You’re also just rare
Reasonable
If you really like to see clowns that think they are 100% you might like to see r/austrian_economics
This is how I got started. I found a decent refurbed Optiplex.
The loan was used to evade taxes. Those loans on stocks are effectively turning their stocks into gains and should be taxed as such.