Philip answered him, 2 books is not sufficient for them. And Jesus took the books; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down. Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the new copies, which remained over.

  • 33 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 5th, 2024

help-circle











  • I kinda like the baseline security advantages. Not that android can’t be better in security, but none of my friends give a shit, and so my iphone friends walk around with better baseline security.

    https://old.reddit.com/user/ghostinshell000

    hello ,

    ok, here is more than a few posts on this. that said: both have made alot of strides recently, basically the order of consensus is:

    • a google pixel flashed with graphaneos
    • iphone
    • pixel
    • samsung and use adb to remove everything you can.

    also, how the devices are setup and used matter alot. other than a pixel + graphaneos, iphones tend to be better at privacy but the devil is in the details. iphones are also more “hygienic” in alot of ways, that you cant see. BUT android is open source for the most part, and are HGIGHLY configurable. and hardware wise has wider variety of choices.

    security wise also pixel + graphaneos tends to be top shelf. but iphones, tend to have decent track record. and with proper setup and some addons, it really locks down pretty decently. for other androids, the proper addons, and adb mode to remove all the junk.

    support wise? pretty much apple kills it, and everyone else is second and in some cases really distant second or even worse. also google does csam scanning and has blocked folks in false positives and the support structure does not have any way for manual review to get your account back it takes months of fighting them from the reports I have read.

    this is all part of the really bad support model thats google. while, google one support of easy things is decent, when it gets real your chances get dicey…

    apples support is decent on all levels, not great but decent and in almost all cases better then googles.

    data protection? its an apple game now, you can enable adp and the key that encrypts your data is yours and apple documents what key encrypts what data. google, on the other hand, says they encrypt things but the dont really have any good documentation on whats encrypted and whos key encrypts what noor do they allow you to use a key you create like apple does.

    backup and recover? while they both do it, apples backup and restore is light years better, googles works, but app level stuff the app devs must create a manifest which tells the backup process what to backup etc. so, over all they both work, its just that apples works better.

    applepay vs googlepay, they both work and both are secure, but apples doing full tokenization and googles doing virtual credit card numbers to front for your real card, googles nebales more compatibility with banks easier, apple requires actual setup and key exchanges to onboard each bank. but in the long run while both are considered good, apples is the better way.

    IOT and automation, both have a ton of automation, tho googles probably ahead here. but for the iot and home stuff a new standard “matter” will standardize it all so future state wont matter what device you have.

    thats it for now.

























  • Does nobody use the god given Repository of all human knowledge?

    There are privacy issues that still have not been addressed as of 2023:

    A privacy review of Tribler, the onion-routed BitTorrent app

    https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/tribler-onion-routed-bittorrent.html

    Daniel Aleksandersen 2022-01-11 10:35Z

    Hi Anth0rx, yes — I’ve looked into all of them. Here are some hot-takes:

    Loginet is just a front for a cryptocurrency. It’s decentralized but not distributed. It’s primary purpose is to selling you hot air, though.

    I2P can only talk to other I2P users. There are far from enough users on it to reliably use it for P2P. There’s nothing inherently wrong with it, it just never reached critical mass. The set-up process is probably too complicated for most potential users.

    GNUnet has been “fixing the internet” for literally two decades. They‘ve yet to deliver anything. The software download pages clearly warns that it’s still “not yet ready”. It’s an interesting project, but it doesn’t seem to be going anywhere.

    Daniel Aleksandersen 2023-07-02 15:17Z

    The project change log does not indicate any work on any of the things discussed in this article. I might revisit this after the next beta release.

    TLDR: Censorship resistant doesn’t mean anything if they can find you and nail you to a cross