Rather than number of unique applications, I meant amount of traffic when I said “most.”

Stock exchanges, some but not all streaming services, gaming, and any form of direct human communication over internet would be heavily impacted. It could also potentially increase frequency of timeouts during authentication attempts which would make everything else slightly more annoying to use as well.

A large amount but at 500ms+ latency it might as well be useless for most applications.

Oh no! I accidentally left location services on and now they’ve bricked my computer with ransomware! /sarcasm

If you’re using VLC to play downloaded MKV and AVIs then injected threats are far from uncommon.

If a person already has a source for content they trust then go with torrents but if they don’t then it isn’t safer at all.

Pretty easy to identify, quarantine, and repair threats from a browser compared to downloads.

Tbh I feel like downloading anime in any form is an unnecesary security risk. Theres websites that host it for free and adblockers that make them squeaky clean to visit.

As long is it’s not autogenerated then thats fine. The correct statement would be

“What Arch user actually like:” --> “What Arch users are actually like:”

or even “What Arch users actually look like:”

By leaving it as “what they like” you could be implying that they like these things, as in they enjoy them.

“Like” has both a verb definition and an adjective. And also a noun, but I’ve never once seen it used that way lol.

Whats up with the grammar?

The cause being what?

They murdered thousands of people in cities across China. Footage and imagery are very easily accessible all over the internet, and you’re also arguing that there was no trade degredation between China and other nations after 1989?

Present it

In the thumbnail is the Tiananmen Square Tank Man.

Are you claiming a globally televised event which lead to a complete breakdown of trade relations across the world in the 90s, didn’t happen?

(Supposedly) Defending their rights in a court of law and participating in fair elections appears as “infighting” to you, lol.

Removed by mod

No, not perfectly organized invaders, literally any heierarchal group. Because the locals cannot do anything together without consensus. Defence would bw difficult, counter attacking would be impossible or ineffective because the local group would splinter.

Lmao

Insulting Hexbear for actual Fascism is what Fascism is to you?

Primaries aren’t restrictive, its just that nobody actually votes in them. I think the highest turnout in USA history was 36.9 Million people in a primary election, chosen to represent 81 Million DNC Voters and again to represent 329.5 Million Americans total.

There is a huge problem with campaign finance laws in the USA, despite our many laws regulating it, and admittedly not having a democracy would fix that specific problem, but it sure as fuck won’t make any American’s lives better.

Oh OK Boomer, sorry for using the word Tankie to describe anybody other than a 1948 Hungarian/Bulgarian USSR sympathizer. /s

Wouldn’t that just lead to no action being taken and eventually falling to a system of government, likely invaders, who are capable of taking organized actions?

You know, like every power vacuum ever recorded for all of human history?

If you want to fix things I’m all for it, but lets not pretend that the notion of “Western Democracies” being responsible for their problems has any merit whatsoever.