This is so wrong. I would absolutely prefer no comments over incorrect comments, which is exactly what happens when things get over commented
This is so wrong. I would absolutely prefer no comments over incorrect comments, which is exactly what happens when things get over commented
That’s not uncommon for doctors offices and such
Omg so this. Also merging main branches into feature branches instead of rebasing.
You don’t lose info as long as the offset is marked correctly
Logging in local time is fine as long as the offset is marked. Everything else I agree with you though
Exactly this. Anyhow makes error handling in rust actually a joy. It’s only something you need to consider if you’re writing a library for others to use, and in that case, it’s good that rust forces you to be very very explicit
That syntax looks atrocious
Are you using an IDE like rustrover? Rust is by far the easiest language I’ve worked with. It makes it so the only way to write code is the right way
Terrible meme. Go is bad and you should feel bad
Fucking goats?
The web is literally unusable without ad blockers. Your question is like asking “why should I stop bashing my face into the wall?”
Yes it’s crazy
Yeah, you fit right in
Look at some of their other comments. They’ll fit right in with the other lemmy devs
Wtf. You can’t possibly be suggesting that any of this is a good idea
It’s because it’s hard to make them correct. It’s not any harder to write it in rust than in C. Just C lets you do it wrong
IE you can quickly and easily write C that compiles but has runtime issues.
So what’s “easy” about it then? Just getting something to compile? That’s not a very good measure of “easyness”.
How so? That’s like, the thing that makes rust awesome to write.
Lol dangerous?