This is a weird claim, I’m curious to know what was the original message that you replied to

Not enough people or not leftist enough?

Because twitter is now full on right wing

People that want to stay free must learn to vote for the most viable candidate, whether they like them or not. Republicans know the left actually value proper behaviour and consistency from their candidates, so the left is vulnerable to this kind of attack. The republicans don’t care what you say about their candidate, they just want to win. But especially they want you to lose.

He must say: “This debate is officially over” before pulling the trigger.

Logic without empathy is the hallmark of psychopathy

For official business

…and?

I think it reflects the point where we are as a society. Everything is crappy and we all come here to vent.

It’s certaily e-bikes that make nyc a nightmare

Aww, so funny. Lemmy ha 2% posts by linux enthusiasts and 98% posts trying to make fun of linux enthusiasts. It stopped being fun months ago.

Well they found a galaxy at 390 million years after the big bang, that according to current understanding should be billions of years old. That should do, I think?

I suggest you take a good look at Tunic if you haven’t yet. That’s really excellent at doing zelda 1 type stuff.

Produkkt

Though I found that often malice has a part in problems.

For a moment I thought you were posting from the past

I’m sorry. I should have said muggles.

Where did all the energy in the universe come from? This is not physics, it’s methaphysics. We are talking about things that are outside our knowledge and science is descriptive, not prescriptive. Extrapolations must be tested. This is not much different from saying that the most remote galaxies receding at speeds faster than light is impossible, because nothing can travel faster than light. Maybe it’s just matter that can’t break that rule, while space itself can expand at whatever speed, or maybe it’s just an error somewhere in our assumptions. We still don’t know. But we DO think they are receding faster than light.

I think I know what you mean but if it’s what I think you are doing a terrible job at explaining it. Theories in the scientific jargon are not the same as theories in the common parlance. What the commoner calls a “theory” is what we call a conjecture or an hypothesis. A theory in science is a summarization of experimental results, so if this is your take, I get your point.